Skip to content

Threaded post support for NodeBB

Let's Build It
146 5 116.4k 1
  • I have the same problem for thread but this time I can’t solve it 😞

    image.png

    image.png

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

  • @DownPW Let me have a look.

    wrote on last edited by DownPW

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

    Thanks Mark 🙂

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW seems fine, yes. Any obvious conflict with other elements?

    Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    It’s a bit the same problem as the previous bug.

    It would be more interesting to act on the dropdown menu than the other elements one by one but my attempts are not fruitful for the moment.

    We could kill one stone/two birds

  • @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

    Thanks Mark 🙂

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW seems fine, yes. Any obvious conflict with other elements?

    Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    It’s a bit the same problem as the previous bug.

    It would be more interesting to act on the dropdown menu than the other elements one by one but my attempts are not fruitful for the moment.

    We could kill one stone/two birds

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW I see the issue. Can you please make the below CSS changes - notice the ones commented out and their replacements (which you should follow)

    .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline .timeline-event, .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline > [component="post/placeholder"], .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline > [component=post] {
        border-left: none;
        /* transition: transform 0.3s ease !important; */
        transition: margin-left 0.3s ease, margin-right 0.3s ease !important;
        background: var(--bs-body-bg);
        border-radius: var(--bs-border-radius);
    }
    
    li[component=post].threaded {
        /* transform: translateX(-100px); */
        /* transition: transform 0.3s ease !important; */
        margin-left: -75px !important;
        transition: margin-left 0.3s ease, margin-right 0.3s ease !important;
    }
    

    My expectation is that this will still work (but using margin instead of transform), and also ensure that the reverse dropdown is not being hidden by the [component="post"] elements.

    When you use transform on an element, a new stacking order is created for it. As you are transforming a parent which doesn’t have z-index of it’s own, a new stacking order for itself and child elements is created. As a result, the child element with z-index remains below the [component="post"] elements.

    If you want to see this in action before applying the CSS, you can remove translateX(-100px) from the li[component=post].threaded class and then try the dropdown menu again. You’ll notice it appears correctly this time, although the content is not being shifted because the translate has been removed.

    We replace it with margin which is slightly less performant when it comes to animation, but the nature of NodeBB is to lazyload posts, therefore, this negates the overall impact to the DOM.

    Let me know if this works.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    Thats work. Many thanks for resolve
    Thanks for the information, I understand better.

    Would have a working solution other than mine for this :

  • Thats work. Many thanks for resolve
    Thanks for the information, I understand better.

    Would have a working solution other than mine for this :

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab

    @DownPW is that still an issue? I can’t replicate that on your dev site?

    aef70b6b-f702-4a8e-9bab-c0bfd8a34628-image.png

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    cache maybe. I have delete the bugfix because not bug fix 🙂

    image.png

  • Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    cache maybe. I have delete the bugfix because not bug fix 🙂

    image.png

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    cache maybe. I have delete the bugfix because not bug fix

    Yes, I can’t reproduce this.

  • wrote on last edited by

    I mean bug is present but my bug fix don’t work properly.

    test to delete my cache and tell you

  • phenomlab phenomlab referenced this topic on
  • wrote on last edited by

    @phenomlab not cache 😞

  • @phenomlab not cache 😞

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW PM me the link to the post.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    actually, I noticed that it’s not on all the posts.
    it seems that these are the posts where the last response is that of the user (selfpost)

    DONE

  • actually, I noticed that it’s not on all the posts.
    it seems that these are the posts where the last response is that of the user (selfpost)

    DONE

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW I’ll have a look at this later

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    no problem.
    I have resolve this bug with change/replace this CSS CODE (I have just delete transform directive) :

    li.pt-4.self-post:not(.self-post .topic-owner-post).threaded {
       /*transform: translateX(0px) !important;*/
       transition: transform 0.3s ease !important;
       background: var(--bs-body-bg);
       background: var(--bs-body-navbar)!important;
       padding-right: 30px;
       margin-left: 0rem;
       padding-bottom: 0rem !important;
     }
    

    I don’t know if is a goodfix or not.

  • no problem.
    I have resolve this bug with change/replace this CSS CODE (I have just delete transform directive) :

    li.pt-4.self-post:not(.self-post .topic-owner-post).threaded {
       /*transform: translateX(0px) !important;*/
       transition: transform 0.3s ease !important;
       background: var(--bs-body-bg);
       background: var(--bs-body-navbar)!important;
       padding-right: 30px;
       margin-left: 0rem;
       padding-bottom: 0rem !important;
     }
    

    I don’t know if is a goodfix or not.

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW yes, was just typing that!

  • wrote on last edited by

    ha ha 🙂

  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab

    Quick note here for anyone who is using the Threaded Posts code and has recently upgraded to 3.7.0 - only to find the threaded posts is now broken 💔

    This is being caused by the HTML structure changes that 3.7.0 makes in the DOM, meaning the element we used to target pre this release no longer exists. To resolve this, locate the line (within the threaded JS function)

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled').append(threadView);
    

    And replace it with

    $('.topic .sticky-tools .thread-tools').append(threadView);
    

    That should make it re-appear.

  • wrote on last edited by

    Mark hi,
    I dont have this code in my js functions.

  • Mark hi,
    I dont have this code in my js functions.

    wrote on last edited by

    @cagatay Yes, because you have legacy code. The line you have is this

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    

    This will work fine because you are using the browsing users plugin, but should you decide to remove it, the threaded utility will cease to function. I’ve replaced that line with the below on your forum.

    $('.topic .sticky-tools .thread-tools').append(threadView);
    
  • wrote on last edited by

Related Topics
  • Extended functions for Q&A NodeBB plugin

    Let's Build It q&a panels cards
    3
    4
    5 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    DownPW
    Very good like always
  • "most votes" ranking option is not respecting the plugin

    Bugs nodebb
    5
    1
    3 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells Agreed. It takes a more sensible approach. Nobody ever upvotes the first post - it’s usually much further down as the conversation progresses.
  • Material View Support for Stock NodeBB

    Unsolved Let's Build It material view javascript css
    51
    4
    15 Votes
    51 Posts
    27k Views
    DownPW
    Oh yes, that’s what’s super cool, I learn something every day. Afterwards I start from so low in JS
  • Upgrade issues

    Solved Configure nodebb
    2
    1
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    DownPW
    Use this code git fetch # Grab the latest code from the NodeBB repository git checkout v3.x git reset --hard origin/v3.x And you will have the latest version without specifying it https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/upgrade/
  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance nodebb seo
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365 And also https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164 It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”. Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.
  • Setting up a beta NodeBB v3 environment

    Moved Let's Build It nodebb upgrades beta1
    14
    3
    11 Votes
    14 Posts
    6k Views
    phenomlab
    @dave1904 excellent news. Thanks for the feedback
  • 1 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW very useful tip. Thanks
  • NodeBB vs Discourse

    Chitchat nodebb discourse board
    25
    6 Votes
    25 Posts
    14k Views
    RiekMedia
    @phenomlab said in NodeBB vs Discourse: Hetzner eh ? I use them also. In fact, Sudonix is hosted in Nuremberg yes i’m also at hetzner, i have been a customer there for years with a reseller account for domains. My VPS that I host there are also in Nuremberg