Skip to content

Threaded post support for NodeBB

Let's Build It
146 5 116.4k 1
  • wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Just added some transition effects. Note that depending on how many elements there are on the screen, this might cause layout shift.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #23

    oh yes I’m on 1920 x 1080 screen

    oups 🙂

  • oh yes I’m on 1920 x 1080 screen

    oups 🙂

    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @DownPW Does it work now? By 1200px I meant wide

  • wrote on last edited by
    #25

    hmmmm nope

  • hmmmm nope

    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Odd. Seems to work for me.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #27

    nope it’s normal, i’m on 1080px height

  • nope it’s normal, i’m on 1080px height

    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @DownPW I’m going to reset your DEV password and login as you to check

  • wrote on last edited by
    #29

    I see why. Let me fix that

  • wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @DownPW can you log back into DEV and try again? Should be working now.

  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #31

    Here’s a video of the threading code working on stock Harmony on NodeBB.

    However, it’s important to note that the timeline bar is removed and recreated. There is a good reason for this, as without taking this route, it would mean that the timeline bar will look out of place. It’s certainly possible to use the existing bar and use a variety of CSS to move it around, although this is VERY inconsistent in my testing, and lands up being far too complex when it comes to having multiple CSS classes that do not include a specific scenario etc.

    In this case, it’s so much quicker to hide and replace the existing one - we do this in the default view also with the threaded view disabled, and I’m sure you won’t notice the difference 🙂 For obvious reasons, this code is configured to only fire on displays of 1200px or more - obviously, firing on a mobile device wouldn’t look very good at all.

    Here’s the video

    If you like what you see, here’s the code.

    https://github.com/phenomlab/nodebb-harmony-threading

    Final note - The code you see in the video is designed to work with stock Harmony. The code running on Sudonix is VERY different and uses a variety of CSS to render the view you see here. It’s “possible” to emulate this look, although it does mean that you will have to replace your custom CSS with that of Sudonix.

  • Here’s a video of the threading code working on stock Harmony on NodeBB.

    However, it’s important to note that the timeline bar is removed and recreated. There is a good reason for this, as without taking this route, it would mean that the timeline bar will look out of place. It’s certainly possible to use the existing bar and use a variety of CSS to move it around, although this is VERY inconsistent in my testing, and lands up being far too complex when it comes to having multiple CSS classes that do not include a specific scenario etc.

    In this case, it’s so much quicker to hide and replace the existing one - we do this in the default view also with the threaded view disabled, and I’m sure you won’t notice the difference 🙂 For obvious reasons, this code is configured to only fire on displays of 1200px or more - obviously, firing on a mobile device wouldn’t look very good at all.

    Here’s the video

    If you like what you see, here’s the code.

    https://github.com/phenomlab/nodebb-harmony-threading

    Final note - The code you see in the video is designed to work with stock Harmony. The code running on Sudonix is VERY different and uses a variety of CSS to render the view you see here. It’s “possible” to emulate this look, although it does mean that you will have to replace your custom CSS with that of Sudonix.

    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @phenomlab wow… that looks really cool. I need to fire up a NodeBB box and test.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #33
  • wrote on last edited by
    #34

    this is very cool. Thanks @phenomlab

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #35

    Very cool like as already said above and a big thanks for hard work (I see the th function.js and woowwww 🙂 )

    I test it now and I have see this with plugin user-browsers :

    Do you know where it could come from?

    This also breaks the display of the site title

    Can we do the same thing but without expanding the topic toolbar on header ?


    EDIT :

    I see that you seem put other things in the function.js on github like banner, logo, fancybox… 🙂
    I said to myself that I found this file way too long without asking too many questions !

    –> But I have the bug display with user browsers plugin which I will try to solve

  • Very cool like as already said above and a big thanks for hard work (I see the th function.js and woowwww 🙂 )

    I test it now and I have see this with plugin user-browsers :

    Do you know where it could come from?

    This also breaks the display of the site title

    Can we do the same thing but without expanding the topic toolbar on header ?


    EDIT :

    I see that you seem put other things in the function.js on github like banner, logo, fancybox… 🙂
    I said to myself that I found this file way too long without asking too many questions !

    –> But I have the bug display with user browsers plugin which I will try to solve

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #36

    @DownPW hmm. Not sure why I copied all of that code, but will change asap. I also have a fix for the browsing users plugin issue but didn’t include it because others might not be using it.

    I’ll get to this as soon as I can.

    EDIT - Done
    EDIT 2 - I just noticed on your DEV box that you have (thanks to me - sorry) a ton of JS code you don’t need. You should probably clean that up.

  • Very cool like as already said above and a big thanks for hard work (I see the th function.js and woowwww 🙂 )

    I test it now and I have see this with plugin user-browsers :

    Do you know where it could come from?

    This also breaks the display of the site title

    Can we do the same thing but without expanding the topic toolbar on header ?


    EDIT :

    I see that you seem put other things in the function.js on github like banner, logo, fancybox… 🙂
    I said to myself that I found this file way too long without asking too many questions !

    –> But I have the bug display with user browsers plugin which I will try to solve

    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    @DownPW said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    Can we do the same thing but without expanding the topic toolbar on header ?

    Yes, but then you’ll have elements that are wider than the sticky bar which looks odd on scroll.

  • Very cool like as already said above and a big thanks for hard work (I see the th function.js and woowwww 🙂 )

    I test it now and I have see this with plugin user-browsers :

    Do you know where it could come from?

    This also breaks the display of the site title

    Can we do the same thing but without expanding the topic toolbar on header ?


    EDIT :

    I see that you seem put other things in the function.js on github like banner, logo, fancybox… 🙂
    I said to myself that I found this file way too long without asking too many questions !

    –> But I have the bug display with user browsers plugin which I will try to solve

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #38

    @DownPW said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    Do you know where it could come from?

    Yes, just fixed it in your dev environment. I assumed (probably incorrectly) that people may not have this installed, so omitted it. I fixed it in prod because I do have it there, but wanted to keep DEV as vanilla as possible.

    I’ll need to write a function that checks for the existence of this plugin then determines where to inject the toggle switch

    For now, see the below

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul .hidden-xs').append(threadView);
                    // If you have browsing users plugin, comment out the above line and uncomment the one below
                    //$('.topic .sticky-tools ul [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    

    Result (might need some position tweaking…)

    b0de4f7a-55bb-4611-93e5-f43f211b8a70-image.png

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #39

    Good, thanks!!!
    Test asap, i’m on intervention AT work

  • @DownPW hmm. Not sure why I copied all of that code, but will change asap. I also have a fix for the browsing users plugin issue but didn’t include it because others might not be using it.

    I’ll get to this as soon as I can.

    EDIT - Done
    EDIT 2 - I just noticed on your DEV box that you have (thanks to me - sorry) a ton of JS code you don’t need. You should probably clean that up.

    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    EDIT 2 - I just noticed on your DEV box that you have (thanks to me - sorry) a ton of JS code you don’t need. You should probably clean that up.

    no I need it 😉

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    Can we do the same thing but without expanding the topic toolbar on header ?

    Yes, but then you’ll have elements that are wider than the sticky bar which looks odd on scroll.

    Could you still explain to me how to obtain this result so that I can see what I prefer?

  • @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    EDIT 2 - I just noticed on your DEV box that you have (thanks to me - sorry) a ton of JS code you don’t need. You should probably clean that up.

    no I need it 😉

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    Can we do the same thing but without expanding the topic toolbar on header ?

    Yes, but then you’ll have elements that are wider than the sticky bar which looks odd on scroll.

    Could you still explain to me how to obtain this result so that I can see what I prefer?

    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @DownPW said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    Could you still explain to me how to obtain this result so that I can see what I prefer?

    Yes, of course. Locate the below block in the CSS, and comment out margin-left: -8%;

      .topic .threaded.sticky-tools { 
         margin-left: -8%; 
         margin-top: 0px; 
         margin-bottom: 0px; 
         transition: margin-left 0.3s ease, margin-right 0.3s ease; 
       }
    

Related Topics
  • Extended functions for Q&A NodeBB plugin

    Let's Build It q&a panels cards
    3
    4
    5 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    DownPW
    Very good like always
  • Threaded chat support for NodeBB

    Let's Build It threaded chat code
    35
    1
    19 Votes
    35 Posts
    16k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW said in Threaded chat support for NodeBB: Better like this : add shadow and border-left on self answer Of course - you style to your own requirements and taste I’ll commit that CSS we discussed yesterday also
  • build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

    Solved Performance nodebb
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.
  • NodeBB: Creating pages

    Solved Configure nodebb create page
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    mventures
    OK, I think I have figured out how to place a link in the footer which will click to a new page.
  • Setting up a beta NodeBB v3 environment

    Moved Let's Build It nodebb upgrades beta1
    14
    3
    11 Votes
    14 Posts
    6k Views
    phenomlab
    @dave1904 excellent news. Thanks for the feedback
  • Gettin Erors NodeBB

    Solved Configure nodebb eror
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    cagatay
    @phenomlab no forum is working goods. there is no eror message since yestarday.
  • How to fix size of photos & videos NodeBB

    Solved Customisation nodebb nodebb size
    7
    3 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells pleasure. Using percentages makes much more sense in this case. It’s the same argument with px vs pt vs em with fonts, margins, padding, etc., in the sense that em is generally preferred over px and pt https://stackoverflow.com/questions/609517/why-em-instead-of-px
  • Top Ranked Forums

    Chitchat nodebb top ranked
    9
    1
    3 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    The real issue here is that most people consider forums to be “dead” in the sense that nobody uses them anymore, and social media groups have taken their place. Their once dominant stance in the 90’s and early 00’s will never be experienced again, but having said that, there are a number of forums that did in fact survive the social media onslaught, and still enjoy a large user base. Forums tend to be niche. One that immediately sticks out is Reddit - despite looking like it was designed in the 80s, it still has an enormous user base. Another is Stack Overflow, which needs no introduction. The key to any forum is the content it offers, and the more people whom contribute in terms of posting , the more popular and widely respected it becomes as a reliable source of information. Forums are still intensely popular with gamers, alongside those that offer tips on hacking etc.