Skip to content

build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

Solved Performance
2 2 1.2k 1
  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #1

    I saw in the output from ./nodebb build , 2WARNING s:
    Firstly)

    **Entrypoint ... combined size exceeds recommended limit (244 KiB)
    Entrypoints:
    -nodebb (355 KiB)
    -admin (294 KiB)
    

    what does this mean, and is it a problem?

    Secondly)

    WARNING in asset size limit (and listed 4 min.js files)
    
  • I saw in the output from ./nodebb build , 2WARNING s:
    Firstly)

    **Entrypoint ... combined size exceeds recommended limit (244 KiB)
    Entrypoints:
    -nodebb (355 KiB)
    -admin (294 KiB)
    

    what does this mean, and is it a problem?

    Secondly)

    WARNING in asset size limit (and listed 4 min.js files)
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.

  • phenomlab phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • NodeBB recent cards customisation

    Solved Customisation nodebb recent cards
    3
    1
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    JAC
    @phenomlab thank you very much for the assistance Mark, massively appreciated as always. The great thing about this is it’s all documented for other NodeBB users that come looking for solutions . Looks far better .
  • CSS codes to prevent votes to disappear

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    crazycells
    @phenomlab yes, it is thanks a lot…
  • Bug Report

    Solved Bugs nodebb bugs
    47
    1
    26 Votes
    47 Posts
    20k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells Good points, thanks. I completely forgot that classes are added - makes life much simpler! EDIT - seems this is pretty straightforward, and only needs the below CSS .upvoted i { color: var(--bs-user-level) !important; } This then yields [image: 3f072f8a-ebfa-4910-8723-73c493b8e4eb-image.png] However, the caveat here is that the .upvoted class will only show for your upvotes, and nobody else’s. However, this does satisfy the original request however I would love to see my upvoted posts more clearly, because currently, when I upvote, nothing on the post tool is changing, it would be nicer if there is an indication that I have upvoted (like a filled or colored triangle?)
  • NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Solved Performance socket cloudflare nodebb
    24
    3 Votes
    24 Posts
    14k Views
    DownPW
    Solved. Tuto here and here
  • NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

    Moved Performance nodebb v3 nodebb chat
    47
    11 Votes
    47 Posts
    21k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW Seems fine.
  • Q&A Plugin Changes NodeBB

    Solved Customisation nodebb q&a plugin
    25
    1
    6 Votes
    25 Posts
    11k Views
    cagatay
    @phenomlab said in Q&A Plugin Changes NodeBB: float: right; left: 10px; } worked thank you
  • NodeBB 1.19.3

    Solved Performance nodebb 1.19.3 performance
    33
    4 Votes
    33 Posts
    16k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab I find the problem Mark The error message indicated this path : http://localhost:4567/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/styles.css?v=6983dobg16u I change the path url on config.json [image: 47bacc80-f141-41e4-a261-3f8d650cc6f6-image.png] And all it’s good Weird, I didn’t have to change that path before 1.19.3 But this does not prevent the problem from a clean install with Emoji Plugin EDIT: After test, that resolv the problem installation for 1.18.x but not for 1.19.x (I have other error message when I run ./nodebb Setup For resume: NodeJS 16_x with 1.18.x is ok
  • [NODEBB] Wallpapers BUG on Firefox Mobile ?

    Solved Customisation nodebb wallpaper firefox mobile
    9
    1
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @downpw I’m inclined to agree with this. There isn’t much else you can do, and provided it works with no odd looking artefacts in other browsers, then ok. The :before and :after are pseudo classes and very well supported across all browsers (except perhaps Internet Exploder, but who uses that these days ?)