Skip to content

Widget | CSS customization

Solved WordPress
53 2 18.9k 1
  • @phenomlab i suspect the ads inside the content in articles , are not benefiting from full width of the article div container, probably they’re in some other container? Bcoz all the time (on mobile) they’re positioned at center and with a small width

    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @Sala said in Widget | CSS customization:

    probably they’re in some other container?

    Yes, likely.

  • @Sala said in Widget | CSS customization:

    probably they’re in some other container?

    Yes, likely.

    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @phenomlab we break that container, when some time ever comes. Full width has potential of increasing chance of click, tho could sound annoying, i know

  • @Sala said in Widget | CSS customization:

    In additional css, i’ve iframe { width 100% and height 315 but without important. If i add important, it affects the height of the ads

    It will do, yes, because you have this CSS present

    div.text img {
        width: 100%;
        height: 315px;
    }
    

    You’d need to be more specific here in terms of CSS target. The below would work

    .perfmatters-lazy-youtube img {
        height: 500px !important;
    }
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @phenomlab it appears this css didn’t take effect, despite using ! important. If you able to see the path, i could change it from cpanel. Google reported the same issue today.

    .perfmatters-lazy-youtube img{height:315px!important}
    

    Page example: view-source:https://sopriza.com/how-kenya-can-use-films-to-attract-more-tourists/

  • @phenomlab it appears this css didn’t take effect, despite using ! important. If you able to see the path, i could change it from cpanel. Google reported the same issue today.

    .perfmatters-lazy-youtube img{height:315px!important}
    

    Page example: view-source:https://sopriza.com/how-kenya-can-use-films-to-attract-more-tourists/

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #30

    @Sala Try locating the CSS block

    div.text img
    

    And replace it with

    div.text img:not([data-perfmatters-preload])
    

    So, you land up with

    @media (min-width: 800px) {
    div.text img:not([data-perfmatters-preload]) {
        width: 100%;
        height: 315px;
       }
    }
    
  • @Sala Try locating the CSS block

    div.text img
    

    And replace it with

    div.text img:not([data-perfmatters-preload])
    

    So, you land up with

    @media (min-width: 800px) {
    div.text img:not([data-perfmatters-preload]) {
        width: 100%;
        height: 315px;
       }
    }
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @phenomlab 480*360 its being read from the ytimage so it could be a background img? I have attempted to apply the last css 2 mins ago, and it did not work

  • @phenomlab 480*360 its being read from the ytimage so it could be a background img? I have attempted to apply the last css 2 mins ago, and it did not work

    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @Sala Works for me - are you testing this on a desktop? The mobile CSS is a different class

    38198d2b-8636-4419-ada2-c92056ede95c-image.png

  • @Sala Works for me - are you testing this on a desktop? The mobile CSS is a different class

    38198d2b-8636-4419-ada2-c92056ede95c-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @phenomlab i am refreshing the view:source url using mobile, please let me have the class for mobile, i apply

  • @phenomlab i am refreshing the view:source url using mobile, please let me have the class for mobile, i apply

    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @Sala In mobile view, it looks fine already

    7b1e88df-e6b9-4862-9f4f-8620ef4328ce-image.png

  • @Sala In mobile view, it looks fine already

    7b1e88df-e6b9-4862-9f4f-8620ef4328ce-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @phenomlab surprisingly on source code the yt thumbnail is still width=“480” height=“360”

  • @phenomlab surprisingly on source code the yt thumbnail is still width=“480” height=“360”

    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @Sala No, it isn’t

    f972f4cd-f3f0-467e-a825-ef0d62213391-image.png

  • @Sala No, it isn’t

    f972f4cd-f3f0-467e-a825-ef0d62213391-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #37
  • wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @Sala Those are just placeholders and inherited from the iframe embed. If you change those values, nothing will happen.

  • @Sala Those are just placeholders and inherited from the iframe embed. If you change those values, nothing will happen.

    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    @phenomlab you know the current yt video size is 400 * 225, on that line at the end of that code and still its reported to be very tall. So these placeholders could be the culprit

  • @phenomlab you know the current yt video size is 400 * 225, on that line at the end of that code and still its reported to be very tall. So these placeholders could be the culprit

    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @Sala What do you get if you try in incognito? It works fine for me.

  • @Sala What do you get if you try in incognito? It works fine for me.

    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @phenomlab we are called off for supper, will attempt to check using that, the browser would have to start a fresh. Catch up on later. Many thanks bdw

  • @Sala What do you get if you try in incognito? It works fine for me.

    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @phenomlab i also believe the video is okay, though the report is still unclear.

    Is this a video issue or its the article image?
    alt text

  • @phenomlab i also believe the video is okay, though the report is still unclear.

    Is this a video issue or its the article image?
    alt text

    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @Sala That’s telling you that the video is too tall, and doesn’t meet Google’s criteria. You should remove the CSS below and be more specific with image sizes

    div.text img {
        width: 100%;
        height: 315px;
    }
    

    You are targeting all img tags with this CSS, which is less than desirable. Let’s first remove this CSS and see if that resolves the Google crawl issue which I’m confident it will.

  • @Sala That’s telling you that the video is too tall, and doesn’t meet Google’s criteria. You should remove the CSS below and be more specific with image sizes

    div.text img {
        width: 100%;
        height: 315px;
    }
    

    You are targeting all img tags with this CSS, which is less than desirable. Let’s first remove this CSS and see if that resolves the Google crawl issue which I’m confident it will.

    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @phenomlab sure, let me compose myself, because the css currently is wrapped up. But, what of the height if we remove its going to use the image height which sometime back i saw them occupying a large space.

    div.text is affecting even yt video d**n, that brings up the picture 👍

  • @phenomlab sure, let me compose myself, because the css currently is wrapped up. But, what of the height if we remove its going to use the image height which sometime back i saw them occupying a large space.

    div.text is affecting even yt video d**n, that brings up the picture 👍

    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @Sala it will affect that because you are targeting all img elements - this is why I said to remove that CSS block

  • @Sala it will affect that because you are targeting all img elements - this is why I said to remove that CSS block

    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @phenomlab On it sir


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Material View Support for Stock NodeBB

    Unsolved Let's Build It material view javascript css
    51
    4
    15 Votes
    51 Posts
    27k Views
    DownPW
    Oh yes, that’s what’s super cool, I learn something every day. Afterwards I start from so low in JS
  • nodebb-user-level customisation : popover element

    Solved Customisation css user level plugin custom
    15
    6 Votes
    15 Posts
    5k Views
    DownPW
    No no, I said that in the sense that he told me it was simple ^^ I was able to see that this was not the case by targeting the elements he had advised me.
  • Fixing YouTube videos css

    Solved WordPress css
    8
    2 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    Sala
    @phenomlab It looks good, but not anymore. I’ve already lost so much time. Now it’s time to move on
  • Footer bar add center text

    Solved Customisation css
    41
    1
    8 Votes
    41 Posts
    19k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab said in Footer bar add center text: div#console-nav-tab Ah ok test with bottom: 0px !important; idem
  • Blinking text Effect

    Customisation nodebb text effect css
    3
    5 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab I love it too @phenomlab said in Blinking text Effect: Has that “broken neon light” look that you see in films. It’s exactly that, kind of old neon signs of bar or pubs a bit cyberpunk too
  • [NODEBB] CSS Style Sheets SelectBox

    Locked Solved Customisation css
    112
    24 Votes
    112 Posts
    63k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW as discussed in PM Seems to have been solved with the new JS code that you added allowing the version CSS file change!! Cache problem therefore with the JS of the Switcher theme Based on this, I will close this thread and reference https://sudonix.com/topic/207/nodebb-help-for-my-custom-css/27
  • Discourse Design Change

    Customisation design change css html
    25
    7 Votes
    25 Posts
    10k Views
    RiekMedia
    @phenomlab okay
  • NodeBB Design help

    Solved Customisation
    8
    3
    2 Votes
    8 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlab
    @riekmedia I’ve applied some new CSS to your site. Can you reload the page and try again ? For the record, this is what I added #footer { background: #2d343e; border-top: 4px solid #2d343e; font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 70px; padding: 80px 0 0; position: relative; clear: both; bottom: 0; left: 0; right: 0; z-index: 1000; margin-left: -15px; margin-right: -338px; } The /categories page seems a bit messed up, so looking at that currently EDIT - issued some override CSS in the CATEGORIES widget <!--- CSS fix for overspill on /categories page - DO NOT DELETE --> <style> #footer { margin-right: -45px; } </style> That should resolve the /categories issue.