Skip to content

Digitalocean step by step guide to nginx configuration

Solved Configure
36 2 15.1k 1
  • @justoverclock You can drop the vfgest conf file as it’s not being used

    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @phenomlab thank you very much!!!

  • @phenomlab thank you very much!!!

    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @justoverclock Anytime

  • @phenomlab thank you very much!!!

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #20

    @justoverclock You should change your app so that it only listens on localhost or 127.0.0.1 for security reasons as you are currently exposing it publicly via port 8080. The reverse proxy means that this is not required, as nginx redirects it for you and is fully secure.

  • @justoverclock You should change your app so that it only listens on localhost or 127.0.0.1 for security reasons as you are currently exposing it publicly via port 8080. The reverse proxy means that this is not required, as nginx redirects it for you and is fully secure.

    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @phenomlab so now this app use a server created by me with nodejs…so all the api endpoints are available through port 3030

    can i set the env variable to https://vfgest.it:3030 ?

  • @phenomlab so now this app use a server created by me with nodejs…so all the api endpoints are available through port 3030

    can i set the env variable to https://vfgest.it:3030 ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @justoverclock If the app is listening on 8080, which it typically would, then no, leave it alone. Are the endpoints intended to be public ? Typically, these aren’t accessible via nginx

  • @justoverclock If the app is listening on 8080, which it typically would, then no, leave it alone. Are the endpoints intended to be public ? Typically, these aren’t accessible via nginx

    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @phenomlab if now i try to login, the endpoint of my api doesn’t work because of mixed content

    Mixed Content: The page at 'https://vfgest.it/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure XMLHttpRequest endpoint 'http://MYSERVERIP:3030/api/login'. This request has been blocked; the content must be served over HTTPS.
    
  • @phenomlab if now i try to login, the endpoint of my api doesn’t work because of mixed content

    Mixed Content: The page at 'https://vfgest.it/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure XMLHttpRequest endpoint 'http://MYSERVERIP:3030/api/login'. This request has been blocked; the content must be served over HTTPS.
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @justoverclock Yes, that’s expected. You should change your endpoint so it works over https otherwise it won’t be secure, and is then subject to eavesdropping as the traffic is being sent in clear text. From a security standpoint, this is an absolute no.

  • @justoverclock Yes, that’s expected. You should change your endpoint so it works over https otherwise it won’t be secure, and is then subject to eavesdropping as the traffic is being sent in clear text. From a security standpoint, this is an absolute no.

    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @phenomlab ok, so i can add https, can i leave the ip or i need to add vfgest.it:3030?

  • @phenomlab ok, so i can add https, can i leave the ip or i need to add vfgest.it:3030?

    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @justoverclock You can use either, but if the API is not meant to be exposed publicly, and should only be accessed by the app itself, then you should use 127.0.0.1. Ultimately, the design is up to you.

  • @justoverclock You can use either, but if the API is not meant to be exposed publicly, and should only be accessed by the app itself, then you should use 127.0.0.1. Ultimately, the design is up to you.

    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @phenomlab well, i’ve learned something new, no its a private crm developed by me, so no external use 🙂

  • @phenomlab well, i’ve learned something new, no its a private crm developed by me, so no external use 🙂

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #28

    @justoverclock Exactly - that’s why I asked 🙂 You won’t be exposing the API then. Any issues, let me know.

  • @justoverclock Exactly - that’s why I asked 🙂 You won’t be exposing the API then. Any issues, let me know.

    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @phenomlab ok i’ll try later when people are not using the crm :P, and i’ll post here the result 😄

  • @phenomlab ok i’ll try later when people are not using the crm :P, and i’ll post here the result 😄

    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @justoverclock No problems.

  • phenomlab phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • phenomlab phenomlab referenced this topic on
  • @justoverclock No problems.

    wrote on last edited by justoverclock
    #31

    @phenomlab its odd but doesn’t work if i use https://vfgest.it:3030 or https://SERVERIP:3030 or https://127.0.0.1:3030

    must be something related to proxy…because server and client are on the same server…but works if i restore all to previous unsecure http connection

  • @phenomlab its odd but doesn’t work if i use https://vfgest.it:3030 or https://SERVERIP:3030 or https://127.0.0.1:3030

    must be something related to proxy…because server and client are on the same server…but works if i restore all to previous unsecure http connection

    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @justoverclock i’ve found an article that says
    To resolve your issue you can setup nginx to proxy your http backend urls via https. With nginx server you will need to call your api like https://your_domain/api/some_path and nginx will proxy your request to api host, that you will set in config

    so my server actually is on port 3030, what should i do?

    thx!

  • @justoverclock i’ve found an article that says
    To resolve your issue you can setup nginx to proxy your http backend urls via https. With nginx server you will need to call your api like https://your_domain/api/some_path and nginx will proxy your request to api host, that you will set in config

    so my server actually is on port 3030, what should i do?

    thx!

    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @justoverclock ok i’ve found the solution by myself watching your files…

    -i’ve created a subdomain

    • a new server blocks that proxy requests to the backend endpoint
    • secured with certbot

    all works fine 🍕

  • @justoverclock ok i’ve found the solution by myself watching your files…

    -i’ve created a subdomain

    • a new server blocks that proxy requests to the backend endpoint
    • secured with certbot

    all works fine 🍕

    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @justoverclock Beat me to it ! I was going to say that you could add another server block to the existing configuration, so for example

    location /api {
                    proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
                    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
                    proxy_set_header Host $http_host;
                    proxy_set_header X-NginX-Proxy true;
    
                    proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:3030/;
                    proxy_redirect off;
    
                    # Socket.IO Support
                    proxy_http_version 1.1;
                    proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
                    proxy_set_header Connection "upgrade";
    }
  • @justoverclock Beat me to it ! I was going to say that you could add another server block to the existing configuration, so for example

    location /api {
                    proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
                    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
                    proxy_set_header Host $http_host;
                    proxy_set_header X-NginX-Proxy true;
    
                    proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:3030/;
                    proxy_redirect off;
    
                    # Socket.IO Support
                    proxy_http_version 1.1;
                    proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
                    proxy_set_header Connection "upgrade";
    }
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @phenomlab 😛 i’m learning ahahahah 🙏

  • @phenomlab 😛 i’m learning ahahahah 🙏

    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @justoverclock said in Digitalocean step by step guide to nginx configuration:

    i’m learning

    And that’s the whole point of this site 🙂 If you don’t learn anything, you gain nothing.


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • 3 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW said in Nginx core developer quits project in security dispute, starts “freenginx” fork: Maybe virtualmin implement it in the future… I don’t think they will - my guess is that they will stick with the current branch of NGINX. I’ve not personally tested it, but the GIT page seems to be very active. This is equally impressive [image: 8ac0d197-68fa-4bd8-bfa3-87237bf8f1f4-image.png] I think the most impressive on here is the native support of HTTP 3
  • Is nginx necessary to use?

    Moved Solved Hosting nginx web
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Cloudflare bot fight mode and Google search: Basic question again, is nginx necessary to use? No, but you’d need something at least to handle the inbound requests, so you could use Apache, NGINX, Caddy… (there are plenty of them, but I tend to prefer NGINX) @Panda said in Cloudflare bot fight mode and Google search: Do these two sites need to be attached to different ports, and the ports put in the DNS record? No. They will both use ports 80 (HTTP) and 443 (HTTPS) by default. @Panda said in Cloudflare bot fight mode and Google search: Its not currently working, but how would the domain name know which of the two sites to resolve to without more info? Currently it only says the IP of the whole server. Yes, that’s correct. Domain routing is handled (for example) at the NGINX level, so whatever you have in DNS will be presented as the hostname, and NGINX will expect a match which once received, will then be forwarded onto the relevant destination. As an example, in your NGINX config, you could have (at a basic level used in reverse proxy mode - obviously, the IP addresses here are redacted and replaced with fakes). We assume you have created an A record in your DNS called “proxy” which resolves to 192.206.28.1, so fully qualified, will be proxy.sudonix.org in this case. The web browser requests this site, which is in turn received by NGINX and matches the below config server { server_name proxy.sudonix.org; listen 192.206.28.1; root /home/sudonix.org/domains/proxy.sudonix.org/ogproxy; index index.php index.htm index.html; access_log /var/log/virtualmin/proxy.sudonix.org_access_log; error_log /var/log/virtualmin/proxy.sudonix.org_error_log; location / { proxy_set_header Access-Control-Allow-Origin *; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_pass http://localhost:2000; proxy_redirect off; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header X-Api-Key $http_x_api_key; } location /images { index index.php index.htm index.html; root /home/sudonix.org/domains/proxy.sudonix.org/ogproxy; } fastcgi_split_path_info "^(.+\.php)(/.+)$"; listen 192.206.28.1:443 ssl http2; ssl_certificate /home/sudonix.org/domains/proxy.sudonix.org/ssl.combined; ssl_certificate_key /home/sudonix.org/ssl.key; } The important part here is server_name proxy.sudonix.org; as this is used to “map” the request to the actual domain name, which you can see in the root section as root /home/sudonix.org/domains/proxy.sudonix.org/ogproxy; As the DNS record you specified matches this hostname, NGINX then knows what to do with the request when it receives it.
  • NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

    Solved Performance performance nodebb nginx
    69
    4
    14 Votes
    69 Posts
    63k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab Seems to be better with some scaling fix for redis on redis.conf. I haven’t seen the message yet since the changes I made # I increase it to the value of /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn tcp-backlog 4096 # I'm uncommenting because it can slow down Redis. Uncommented by default !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #save 900 1 #save 300 10 #save 60 10000 If you have other Redis optimizations. I take all your advice https://severalnines.com/blog/performance-tuning-redis/
  • 4 Votes
    8 Posts
    5k Views
    WesleyMoura
    @phenomlab Sorry to delay in responding, yes as i mentioned above, i had to remove my redis from docker and reinstall a new image with this command docker run --name=redis -p 127.0.0.1:6379:6379 -d -t redis:alpine and now when i test my ip and port on https://www.yougetsignal.com/tools/open-ports/ the status of my redis port is closed. I think which to configure firewall in droplet digital ocean is a good idea too, and i will configure soon. Thanks for the help!
  • Do i need more RAM? Plesk

    Solved Performance plesk digitalocean
    3
    1
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Hari welcome to Grafana, the most confusing stats package there is ! According to the guidelines, you certainly have enough RAM at 4gb https://www.plesk.com/blog/various/plesk-requirements-hardware-software/
  • Configure SMTP for Nodebb

    Solved Configure
    14
    5 Votes
    14 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlab
    @marusaky based on the work completed thus far (in relation to PM exchanges), I’m going to mark this completed. Sending email from the server itself works fine without issue, and DNS appears to be clean (valid SPF, DMARC, and DKIM records). It appears that only Gmail marks incoming messages from your domain as spam - perhaps because of the domain age, which there is nothing we can do to prevent this. Mail delivery to all other domains appears to work fine in al of my tests.
  • nginx seo urls

    Solved Configure
    15
    3 Votes
    15 Posts
    6k Views
    phenomlab
    @riekmedia that looks fine to me
  • Digitalocean Ubuntu configuration

    Solved Linux
    33
    12 Votes
    33 Posts
    14k Views
    justoverclock
    @phenomlab thank you! not me