Skip to content

Threaded post support for NodeBB

Let's Build It
146 5 116.4k 1
  • this code does not work for me. No button

    EDIT:

    The code on github is OK, not the last share above

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    The code on github is OK, not the last share above

    Sorry - changed that to the Git link

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    Just don’t forget to comment out lines for browsing-users plugin

    I’m got screwed 😉

    Good work my friend

  • Just don’t forget to comment out lines for browsing-users plugin

    I’m got screwed 😉

    Good work my friend

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab

    @DownPW This part?

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul .hidden-xs').append(threadView);
    // If you have browsing users plugin, comment out the above line and uncomment the one below
    //$('.topic .sticky-tools ul [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    

    Yes, I need to fix that! Thanks for the reminder.

  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab

    For anyone else browsing here who has tried the code in git but wants it to look exactly like Sudonix, please note that this code is not public because it is heavily adapted to match the layout of this site. There are some Sudonix “clones” around so you can actually have this code if you really want it, but it comes with some conditions;

    1. You should consider buying me a coffee - see “Buy me a Coffee” link
    2. You have to provide a backlink to this site from your own - it needs to be visible and cannot be hidden - obviously, I can’t (and won’t) make you do this, but it’s courteous to recognize the original author - particularly when hundreds of hours were spent creating all of this eye candy 🙂
  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    Hello @phenomlab

    I see this, when someone composes, it is displayed via the plugin like this (To the left of the Thread View button.). I do not know if it’s normal or if it is better to put it on the right like the others ?

    image.png

    or myself for example :

    33a99e14-13e5-4e67-beaa-25d02b39bb59-image.png

  • Hello @phenomlab

    I see this, when someone composes, it is displayed via the plugin like this (To the left of the Thread View button.). I do not know if it’s normal or if it is better to put it on the right like the others ?

    image.png

    or myself for example :

    33a99e14-13e5-4e67-beaa-25d02b39bb59-image.png

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab

    @DownPW Mmmm - I thought that this would happen. In your js function, can you locate this line

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul .hidden-xs').append(threadView);
    

    Replace it with

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled').append(threadView);
    

    51179c3a-e0cf-4f1f-a36b-79beb1655e88-image.png

    The issue here is that the hidden-xs class is being manipulated by js which forces the position and does not use relative. This new code should hopefully work around that. It will change the placement of the threaded toggle, but for the better I think. If this works, I’ll commit the code to git

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    @phenomlab

    I don’t use this line, I commented out this line as stipulated in the script

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul .hidden-xs').append(threadView);
    

    But use this line :

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    

    image.png

    maybe change for this ?

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    
  • @phenomlab

    I don’t use this line, I commented out this line as stipulated in the script

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul .hidden-xs').append(threadView);
    

    But use this line :

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    

    image.png

    maybe change for this ?

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    
    wrote on last edited by phenomlab

    @DownPW sorry, use this one.

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled').append(threadView);
    

    Replace any existing line

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    image.png

    With this code the entire plugin is now displayed to the left of the Thread View button. I even think I prefer the way it was before.
    I find it more logical that all users are displayed to the right of the button and not to the left.

  • image.png

    With this code the entire plugin is now displayed to the left of the Thread View button. I even think I prefer the way it was before.
    I find it more logical that all users are displayed to the right of the button and not to the left.

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab

    @DownPW up to you of course but the browsing users plugin makes several adjustments to element positioning, and without moving the threading toggle outside of that, you’ll always have the issue where the composing user appears on the left because under the old code, the threading toggle shares the same space which causes the alignment issue.

    Moving outside of that div is the only way to resolve the issue. There is another way which is to append the topic tools element but that then means that users without adequate permissions will not be able to use the threading toggle at all.

  • wrote on last edited by

    hello @phenomlab

    I see this bug with thread view mode :

    image.png

    maybe play with z-index for resolve ?

  • hello @phenomlab

    I see this bug with thread view mode :

    image.png

    maybe play with z-index for resolve ?

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab

    @DownPW yes, that’s definitely a z-index issue.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    After test, seems to be good with add this in JS function in if and else :

    $('[component="topic/quickreply/container"]').addClass('threaded'); //test
    
    $('[component="topic/quickreply/container"]').removeClass('threaded'); //test
    

    and this to CSS :

    [component="topic/quickreply/container"].threaded {
        z-index: -1 !important;
        position: relative;
    }
    

    Tell me if this seems correct to you @phenomlab

  • After test, seems to be good with add this in JS function in if and else :

    $('[component="topic/quickreply/container"]').addClass('threaded'); //test
    
    $('[component="topic/quickreply/container"]').removeClass('threaded'); //test
    

    and this to CSS :

    [component="topic/quickreply/container"].threaded {
        z-index: -1 !important;
        position: relative;
    }
    

    Tell me if this seems correct to you @phenomlab

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW seems fine, yes. Any obvious conflict with other elements?

  • wrote on last edited by

    I haven’t tested everything. this is something to watch out for

  • wrote on last edited by

    I have the same problem for thread but this time I can’t solve it 😞

    image.png

    image.png

  • I have the same problem for thread but this time I can’t solve it 😞

    image.png

    image.png

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

  • @DownPW Let me have a look.

    wrote on last edited by DownPW

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

    Thanks Mark 🙂

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW seems fine, yes. Any obvious conflict with other elements?

    Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    It’s a bit the same problem as the previous bug.

    It would be more interesting to act on the dropdown menu than the other elements one by one but my attempts are not fruitful for the moment.

    We could kill one stone/two birds

  • @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

    Thanks Mark 🙂

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW seems fine, yes. Any obvious conflict with other elements?

    Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    It’s a bit the same problem as the previous bug.

    It would be more interesting to act on the dropdown menu than the other elements one by one but my attempts are not fruitful for the moment.

    We could kill one stone/two birds

    wrote on last edited by

    @DownPW I see the issue. Can you please make the below CSS changes - notice the ones commented out and their replacements (which you should follow)

    .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline .timeline-event, .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline > [component="post/placeholder"], .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline > [component=post] {
        border-left: none;
        /* transition: transform 0.3s ease !important; */
        transition: margin-left 0.3s ease, margin-right 0.3s ease !important;
        background: var(--bs-body-bg);
        border-radius: var(--bs-border-radius);
    }
    
    li[component=post].threaded {
        /* transform: translateX(-100px); */
        /* transition: transform 0.3s ease !important; */
        margin-left: -75px !important;
        transition: margin-left 0.3s ease, margin-right 0.3s ease !important;
    }
    

    My expectation is that this will still work (but using margin instead of transform), and also ensure that the reverse dropdown is not being hidden by the [component="post"] elements.

    When you use transform on an element, a new stacking order is created for it. As you are transforming a parent which doesn’t have z-index of it’s own, a new stacking order for itself and child elements is created. As a result, the child element with z-index remains below the [component="post"] elements.

    If you want to see this in action before applying the CSS, you can remove translateX(-100px) from the li[component=post].threaded class and then try the dropdown menu again. You’ll notice it appears correctly this time, although the content is not being shifted because the translate has been removed.

    We replace it with margin which is slightly less performant when it comes to animation, but the nature of NodeBB is to lazyload posts, therefore, this negates the overall impact to the DOM.

    Let me know if this works.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW

    Thats work. Many thanks for resolve
    Thanks for the information, I understand better.

    Would have a working solution other than mine for this :


Related Topics
  • What’s going on with NodeBB?

    Performance nodebb script die
    20
    8 Votes
    20 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlab
    @cagatay The most reliable way to upgrade Node.js on Ubuntu depends on how you originally installed it. Method 1: Using NVM (Recommended) If you already use Node Version Manager (NVM), upgrading is simple. NVM allows you to keep both versions and switch between them if needed. Install Node 22: nvm install 22 Switch to Node 22: nvm use 22 Set it as your default: nvm alias default 22 Verify the change: node -v Method 2: Using NodeSource (PPA) If you installed Node.js via apt using the NodeSource repository, you need to update the repository script to point to the new version. Remove the old NodeSource list (optional but cleaner): sudo rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/nodesource.list Download and run the NodeSource setup script for Node 22: curl -fsSL [https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_22.x](https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_22.x) | sudo -E bash - Install/Upgrade Node.js: sudo apt-get install -y nodejs Verify the installation: node -v Method 3: Using the ‘n’ Package If you have npm installed, you can use the n interactive manager. Clear the npm cache: sudo npm cache clean -f Install the ‘n’ helper: sudo npm install -g n Install Node 22: sudo n 22 Update your shell: hash -r Troubleshooting Permission Denied: If you see permission errors using Method 2 or 3, ensure you are using sudo. Path Issues: If node -v still shows version 20 after upgrading via NVM, restart your terminal or run source ~/.bashrc. Conflicts: Avoid mixing these methods. If you switch from apt to nvm, it is best to sudo apt remove nodejs first to avoid path conflicts.
  • 3 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    DownPW
    Very great
  • NodeBB Twitter / X embeds

    Let's Build It twitter script
    34
    21 Votes
    34 Posts
    16k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab said: @DownPW thanks for spotting (and fixing) this issue. I admittedly threw this together quickly for @jac some time ago, and it hasn’t had any love since. If OK with you, I’ll merge these changes into the github repository? No problem dude
  • Extended functions for Q&A NodeBB plugin

    Let's Build It q&a panels cards
    3
    4
    5 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    DownPW
    Very good like always
  • Material View Support for Stock NodeBB

    Unsolved Let's Build It material view javascript css
    51
    4
    15 Votes
    51 Posts
    27k Views
    DownPW
    Oh yes, that’s what’s super cool, I learn something every day. Afterwards I start from so low in JS
  • Want to use Sudonix themes ?

    Chitchat themes nodebb
    80
    1
    34 Votes
    80 Posts
    30k Views
    cagatay
    omg thank you Mark.
  • NodeBB: The global Search option

    Solved Configure search nodebb
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @mventures Yes, exactly. The other icon will restart NodeBB whilst the first icon I referenced will rebuild (recompile) it. The huge strength of NodeBB over Flarum (for example) is that the code is precompiled, and called once at boot. PHP’s code has to repeatedly reload code from source making it much slower.
  • nodebb loading emojis

    Solved Configure nodebb emojis
    16
    1
    1 Votes
    16 Posts
    6k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW sure. Let me have a look at this in more detail. I know nginx plus has extensive support for this, but it’s not impossible to get somewhere near acceptable with the standard version. You might be better off handling this at the Cloudflare level given that it sits in between the requesting client and your server.