Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation
67 3 35.2k 2
  • @cagatay Seems fine to me ?

    25678c08-ae90-4da6-95a5-c3b1229e7e08-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @phenomlab pls refresh?

  • @phenomlab pls refresh?

    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @cagatay I have. No issues on my side

  • @cagatay I have. No issues on my side

    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @cagatay No problems. I checked this in an incognito session also, with no issues

    748735c8-4141-4185-9d46-4eb3f8023744-image.png

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #48

    @cagatay said in Post Style View:

    maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you

    One thing I have noticed is that there are a number of errors on your site in the console. My concern here is that the jQuery functions I added are not being executed. For example, I removed the below function from your site about 30 minutes ago because it’s malformed

    });ment).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
        	if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
        		var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
        		var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
        		tags.append(bar);
        		
        		var max;
        		
        		setTimeout(function() {
            		tags.each(function() {
            		   var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
            		   var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
            		   max = max > val ? max : val;
            		   
            		   bar.css({
            		       width: val / max * 100 + '%'
            		   });
            		});
        		}, 100)
        	}
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    As you can see, this isn’t right at all. It should be

    $(document).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
            if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
                var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
                var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
                tags.append(bar);
    
                var max;
    
                setTimeout(function () {
                    tags.each(function () {
                        var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
                        var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
                        max = max > val ? max : val;
    
                        bar.css({
                            width: val / max * 100 + '%'
                        });
                    });
                }, 100);
            }
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    I’ve put this back how it should be, but am curious as to where that came from.

  • @cagatay said in Post Style View:

    maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you

    One thing I have noticed is that there are a number of errors on your site in the console. My concern here is that the jQuery functions I added are not being executed. For example, I removed the below function from your site about 30 minutes ago because it’s malformed

    });ment).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
        	if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
        		var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
        		var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
        		tags.append(bar);
        		
        		var max;
        		
        		setTimeout(function() {
            		tags.each(function() {
            		   var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
            		   var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
            		   max = max > val ? max : val;
            		   
            		   bar.css({
            		       width: val / max * 100 + '%'
            		   });
            		});
        		}, 100)
        	}
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    As you can see, this isn’t right at all. It should be

    $(document).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
            if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
                var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
                var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
                tags.append(bar);
    
                var max;
    
                setTimeout(function () {
                    tags.each(function () {
                        var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
                        var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
                        max = max > val ? max : val;
    
                        bar.css({
                            width: val / max * 100 + '%'
                        });
                    });
                }, 100);
            }
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    I’ve put this back how it should be, but am curious as to where that came from.

    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @phenomlab i can not understand how it can be, i do not touch anything js side.

    so now everything is working and code is okey hope so?

  • @phenomlab i can not understand how it can be, i do not touch anything js side.

    so now everything is working and code is okey hope so?

    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @cagatay Not entirely. There is an ajax call I need to use called action:ajaxify.loaded but this does not seem to be firing on your site. It’s opposite, action:ajaxify.end works fine (as you’ll see if you press F5) but the former does not, and I can’t see any reason as to why.

  • @cagatay Not entirely. There is an ajax call I need to use called action:ajaxify.loaded but this does not seem to be firing on your site. It’s opposite, action:ajaxify.end works fine (as you’ll see if you press F5) but the former does not, and I can’t see any reason as to why.

    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    @phenomlab maybe it depends on my nodebb version or really i can not say anything coz i don not know what is the ajax code as well 🙂

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on my nodebb version or really i can not say anything coz i don not know what is the ajax code as well 🙂

    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    @cagatay Your NodeBB is up to date, so not an issue there. Just seems odd that no matter what I try, it doesn’t trigger. Investigating

  • @cagatay Your NodeBB is up to date, so not an issue there. Just seems odd that no matter what I try, it doesn’t trigger. Investigating

    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

  • @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    @cagatay Not sure, but will check out a theory I have first before we go down that route.

  • @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #55

    @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

  • @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

  • @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

    wrote on last edited by
    #59

    @cagatay Yes, but I want to create something more concise and simpler to follow

  • phenomlab phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    
    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #60

    @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.end’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.loaded’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });

    thank you Mark.
    changed it.

  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

  • @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • NodeBB v3 Android Problem

    Solved Configure nodebb android
    4
    4 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    cagatay
    thank you fixed.
  • NodeBB: Creating pages

    Solved Configure nodebb create page
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    mventures
    OK, I think I have figured out how to place a link in the footer which will click to a new page.
  • Chevron up before & after

    Solved Configure nodebb
    11
    1
    4 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    cagatay
    @crazycells you are right thank you.
  • NodeBB 3.0 alpha1 : Error on install

    Solved Configure nodebb version 3 install error
    19
    2 Votes
    19 Posts
    7k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab Work now
  • Adjusting the size of boxes in posts-list class

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    crazycells
    @phenomlab thanks a lot, this combination works best .posts-list .posts-list-item .content { overflow: auto; max-height: 600px; }
  • [NODEBB] CSS Style Sheets SelectBox

    Locked Solved Customisation css
    112
    24 Votes
    112 Posts
    63k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW as discussed in PM Seems to have been solved with the new JS code that you added allowing the version CSS file change!! Cache problem therefore with the JS of the Switcher theme Based on this, I will close this thread and reference https://sudonix.com/topic/207/nodebb-help-for-my-custom-css/27
  • Nav Drop-down [Sudonix]

    Moved Bugs
    3
    1
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    JAC
    @phenomlab said in Nav Drop-down [Sudonix]: @jac Fixed [image: d2e5410b-fa82-4fc9-a861-7913d3c560ab-image.png] Thanks for reporting. Thanks mate, not a problem .