Skip to content

Bootstrap Version

Solved Customisation
8 2 2.6k 1
  • wrote on last edited by
    #1

    So currently nodebb uses bootstrap 3 from what I understand. Is it possible to use a newer version of bootstrap? Or would that just interfere with the rest of the website?

    I have no problem writing custom css, it is just that boot strap is already implemented.

  • So currently nodebb uses bootstrap 3 from what I understand. Is it possible to use a newer version of bootstrap? Or would that just interfere with the rest of the website?

    I have no problem writing custom css, it is just that boot strap is already implemented.

    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    @Madchatthew I think this is going to cause conflicts - not in the sense of JS, but almost definitely CSS. I think it works best to create your own CSS.

  • @Madchatthew I think this is going to cause conflicts - not in the sense of JS, but almost definitely CSS. I think it works best to create your own CSS.

    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @phenomlab that is what I was thinking. Probably be faster too. I won’t have to search for the right bootstrap code… Haha

  • phenomlab phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @phenomlab that is what I was thinking. Probably be faster too. I won’t have to search for the right bootstrap code… Haha

    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @Madchatthew what are you looking to do by the way ?

  • @Madchatthew what are you looking to do by the way ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @phenomlab oh I was just thinking of using a newer bootstrap to design the blog page and the home page. I can use vanilla css. I just thought that bootstrap is already integrated that it would just be quicker and easier. Bootstrap 3 doesn’t have some of those newer features of course.

    Also by using plain css it will be easier to keep updated and such.

  • @phenomlab oh I was just thinking of using a newer bootstrap to design the blog page and the home page. I can use vanilla css. I just thought that bootstrap is already integrated that it would just be quicker and easier. Bootstrap 3 doesn’t have some of those newer features of course.

    Also by using plain css it will be easier to keep updated and such.

    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @Madchatthew makes sense 👍

  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #7

    @Madchatthew just read this

    https://nodebb.org/blog/roadmap-for-2022/

    Screenshot_2022-05-29-13-02-25-42_df198e732186825c8df26e3c5a10d7cd.jpg

    I do recall reading this since time ago but forgot all about it until this recent discussion. It seems that there is an intention to move away from bootstrap 3.

    I don’t think it’ll be as simple as just calling the framework you want without leveraging the newer quoted boilerplates though. Based on this, it would still be a significant effort to introduce a new framework into existing themes without there being conflicts.

  • @Madchatthew just read this

    https://nodebb.org/blog/roadmap-for-2022/

    Screenshot_2022-05-29-13-02-25-42_df198e732186825c8df26e3c5a10d7cd.jpg

    I do recall reading this since time ago but forgot all about it until this recent discussion. It seems that there is an intention to move away from bootstrap 3.

    I don’t think it’ll be as simple as just calling the framework you want without leveraging the newer quoted boilerplates though. Based on this, it would still be a significant effort to introduce a new framework into existing themes without there being conflicts.

    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @phenomlab That will be nice once they have completed that. It will be interesting to see how long that takes. So for now I will use custom css to make it look the way I want. Frameworks just make things a little faster. Thanks @phenomlab


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • NodeBB v4.0.0

    General nodebb sudonix version 4
    28
    4 Votes
    28 Posts
    8k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in NodeBB v4.0.0: the workings of World aren’t intuitive Its not easy to get World populating when a forum is new to it This is a good point and one I’ve considered also. It’s a little confusing to be honest.
  • How to downgrade plugin version on NodeBB

    Solved Customisation downgrade nodebb
    11
    3 Votes
    11 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlab
    @cagatay no problems
  • Post Style View

    Solved Customisation post style sudonix nodebb
    67
    2
    18 Votes
    67 Posts
    35k Views
    DownPW
    @cagatay Just add margin-left on the element like @phenomlab said to you : topic [component="post/parent"] { margin-left: 10px; } [image: aa08c62b-4223-4cba-8c0f-c73d50474c0d-image.png] Maybe @phenomlab have a better way
  • Node Version

    Customisation nodebb version
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Madchatthew No issues. Thanks
  • NodeBB 1.19.3

    Solved Performance nodebb 1.19.3 performance
    33
    4 Votes
    33 Posts
    16k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab I find the problem Mark The error message indicated this path : http://localhost:4567/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/styles.css?v=6983dobg16u I change the path url on config.json [image: 47bacc80-f141-41e4-a261-3f8d650cc6f6-image.png] And all it’s good Weird, I didn’t have to change that path before 1.19.3 But this does not prevent the problem from a clean install with Emoji Plugin EDIT: After test, that resolv the problem installation for 1.18.x but not for 1.19.x (I have other error message when I run ./nodebb Setup For resume: NodeJS 16_x with 1.18.x is ok
  • NodeBB metadata

    Solved Configure nodebb
    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    JAC
    @phenomlab said in NodeBB metadata: @jac Are you sure ? https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Astockportcounty.fans&sxsrf=AOaemvLwnaZL-PliU_2dBOg_Eo1pMVhBjg%3A1638982328139&source=hp&ei=uOKwYeatBcOsad3yp7AE&iflsig=ALs-wAMAAAAAYbDwyLBSDcG5XYoFCKwQFhgz94wTxOcV&ved=0ahUKEwjm6dX71NT0AhVDVhoKHV35CUYQ4dUDCAk&uact=5&oq=site%3Astockportcounty.fans&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6BAgjECc6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOg4ILhCABBCxAxDHARCjAjoRCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQowI6BQguEIAEOggIABCABBCxAzoFCAAQgAQ6CAguELEDEIMBOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToICC4QgAQQsQM6BQgAELEDOgsILhCABBDHARDRAzoLCAAQgAQQsQMQyQM6BQgAEJIDUABYySZg0CdoAHAAeACAAW2IAa0NkgEEMjMuMpgBAKABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz Fair enough 🤪🤪.
  • NodeBB - Created pages not found?

    General
    20
    3 Votes
    20 Posts
    6k Views
    phenomlab
    @jac Exactly. Hard point to argue.
  • nodebb-plugin-customize error

    Solved Customisation
    25
    2 Votes
    25 Posts
    17k Views
    RiekMedia
    @phenomlab it work, thanks