Skip to content

NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

Solved Performance
69 3 62.9k 2
  • @DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    I have already activate it

    Are you sure? When I checked your tenant it wasn’t active - it’s from where I took the screenshot 😁

    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @phenomlab

    yep I activate it after 😉

  • @phenomlab

    yep I activate it after 😉

    wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #17

    For your information @phenomlab ,

    • I have ban via iptables suspicious ip address find on /etc/nginx/accesss.log and virtualhost access.log like this : iptables -I INPUT -s IPADDRESS -j DROP
    • Activate bot option on CF
    • Create contry rules (Russie and China) on CF WAF
    • I left under attack mode option activated on CF
    • I have just change nginx.conf like this for test (If you have best value, I take it ! ) :
    worker_rlimit_nofile 70000; 
    
    events {
    
    	worker_connections 65535;
    	multi_accept on; 
    }
    
    http {
    
    	##
    	# Basic Settings
    	##
    
    	limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; 
    	limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; 
    	limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:10m; 
    	limit_conn ddos 100;
    

    100r/s iit’s already a lot !!

    and for vhost file :

    server {
    	.....
    
            location / {
    				
    				limit_req zone=flood; #Test 
    				limit_conn ddos 100; #Test 
    }
    

    –> If you have other ideas, I’m interested
    –> If you have better values ​​to use in what I modified, please let me know.

  • For your information @phenomlab ,

    • I have ban via iptables suspicious ip address find on /etc/nginx/accesss.log and virtualhost access.log like this : iptables -I INPUT -s IPADDRESS -j DROP
    • Activate bot option on CF
    • Create contry rules (Russie and China) on CF WAF
    • I left under attack mode option activated on CF
    • I have just change nginx.conf like this for test (If you have best value, I take it ! ) :
    worker_rlimit_nofile 70000; 
    
    events {
    
    	worker_connections 65535;
    	multi_accept on; 
    }
    
    http {
    
    	##
    	# Basic Settings
    	##
    
    	limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; 
    	limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; 
    	limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:10m; 
    	limit_conn ddos 100;
    

    100r/s iit’s already a lot !!

    and for vhost file :

    server {
    	.....
    
            location / {
    				
    				limit_req zone=flood; #Test 
    				limit_conn ddos 100; #Test 
    }
    

    –> If you have other ideas, I’m interested
    –> If you have better values ​​to use in what I modified, please let me know.

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #18

    @DownPW my only preference would be to not set worker_connections so high

  • @DownPW my only preference would be to not set worker_connections so high

    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @phenomlab

    Ok so what value do you advise?

  • @phenomlab

    Ok so what value do you advise?

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #20

    @DownPW you should base it on the output of ulimit - see below

    https://linuxhint.com/what-are-worker-connections-nginx/#:~:text=The worker_connections are the maximum,to accommodate a higher value

    With that high value you run the risk of overwhelming your server.

  • @DownPW you should base it on the output of ulimit - see below

    https://linuxhint.com/what-are-worker-connections-nginx/#:~:text=The worker_connections are the maximum,to accommodate a higher value

    With that high value you run the risk of overwhelming your server.

    wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #21

    @phenomlab

    Thanks mark 😉

    My ulimit is 1024, so I will set it to 1024

  • @phenomlab

    Thanks mark 😉

    My ulimit is 1024, so I will set it to 1024

    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @DownPW And the worker_processes value ? I expect this to be between 1 and 4 ?

  • @DownPW And the worker_processes value ? I expect this to be between 1 and 4 ?

    wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #23

    @phenomlab

    worker_processes auto;
    
  • @phenomlab

    worker_processes auto;
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @DownPW ok. You should refer to that some article I previously provided. You can probably set this to a static value.

  • @DownPW ok. You should refer to that some article I previously provided. You can probably set this to a static value.

    wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #25

    @phenomlab

    Ok I will see it for better worker_processes value

    I add a rate limite request and limit_conn_zone on http block and vhost block :

    – nginx.conf:

    http {
    
    	#Requete maximun par ip 
    	limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; 
    	#Connexions maximum par ip 
    	limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:1m;
    
    -- vhost.conf :
            location / {
    				
    				limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; 
    				limit_conn ddos 10;
    

    –> I have test other value for rate and burst but they cause problem access to the forum. If you have better, I take it

    I add today a proxy_read_timeout on vhost.conf (60 by default)

    proxy_read_timeout 180;
    

    I have deactivate underattack mode on CF and change for high Level

    I have add other rules on CF waf :

    9059db6c-f4f3-4415-bb47-ab88b2b41861-image.png

  • @phenomlab

    Ok I will see it for better worker_processes value

    I add a rate limite request and limit_conn_zone on http block and vhost block :

    – nginx.conf:

    http {
    
    	#Requete maximun par ip 
    	limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; 
    	#Connexions maximum par ip 
    	limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:1m;
    
    -- vhost.conf :
            location / {
    				
    				limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; 
    				limit_conn ddos 10;
    

    –> I have test other value for rate and burst but they cause problem access to the forum. If you have better, I take it

    I add today a proxy_read_timeout on vhost.conf (60 by default)

    proxy_read_timeout 180;
    

    I have deactivate underattack mode on CF and change for high Level

    I have add other rules on CF waf :

    9059db6c-f4f3-4415-bb47-ab88b2b41861-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @DownPW what settings do you have in advanced (in settings) for rate limit etc?

  • @DownPW what settings do you have in advanced (in settings) for rate limit etc?

    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW what settings do you have in advanced (in settings) for rate limit etc?

    In cloudflare ?

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #28

    @phenomlab

    I wanted to test awstats on virtualmin with root account and it hasn’t updated since August 2022.

    I wanted to regenerate the files but I have a problem of rights.

    df12b039-076d-4e64-9a8d-ad6580ed57dc-image.png
    4030eec2-29ce-4dcf-83f6-adc60f87be5e-image.png

    What do you think ? and how t ore-generate a rapport correctly

    I would like to use it to better manage the @ips that connect to the server

  • @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW what settings do you have in advanced (in settings) for rate limit etc?

    In cloudflare ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @DownPW no, sorry - in NodeBB ACP

  • @phenomlab

    I wanted to test awstats on virtualmin with root account and it hasn’t updated since August 2022.

    I wanted to regenerate the files but I have a problem of rights.

    df12b039-076d-4e64-9a8d-ad6580ed57dc-image.png
    4030eec2-29ce-4dcf-83f6-adc60f87be5e-image.png

    What do you think ? and how t ore-generate a rapport correctly

    I would like to use it to better manage the @ips that connect to the server

    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @DownPW from recollection, awstats is accessible via the web front end, so (for example) https://mydomain.com/awstats

    However, as you are pushing everything into a reverse proxy you’ll need to add a custom route in the nginx.conf file you are using on the website so this can be rendered outside of NodeBB.

  • @DownPW no, sorry - in NodeBB ACP

    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW no, sorry - in NodeBB ACP

    Here is the value

    28e6dd12-e727-4a6a-a06f-b7c7dd3ed431-image.png

  • @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW no, sorry - in NodeBB ACP

    Here is the value

    28e6dd12-e727-4a6a-a06f-b7c7dd3ed431-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @DownPW what is the result of disabling it altogether? That will resolve the 503 rate limit error but could we leave the system exposed to bring overwhelmed.

  • @DownPW what is the result of disabling it altogether? That will resolve the 503 rate limit error but could we leave the system exposed to bring overwhelmed.

    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @DownPW you should also review this

    https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/scaling/

    In particular, the part concerning proxied assets.

  • @DownPW from recollection, awstats is accessible via the web front end, so (for example) https://mydomain.com/awstats

    However, as you are pushing everything into a reverse proxy you’ll need to add a custom route in the nginx.conf file you are using on the website so this can be rendered outside of NodeBB.

    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW from recollection, awstats is accessible via the web front end, so (for example) https://mydomain.com/awstats

    However, as you are pushing everything into a reverse proxy you’ll need to add a custom route in the nginx.conf file you are using on the website so this can be rendered outside of NodeBB.

    Thats why I have a permission error like the screen? Odd

    Nope, Awstats is accessible like this via Virtualmin:

    https://XXXX:8443/virtualmin-awstats/view.cgi?config=XXXXXX.XX

    a3404ab3-4f2b-4623-9858-534ac8507bce-image.png
    7597a4ac-22e5-4cd6-884c-e149dcb6edbe-image.png
    f8285325-3072-4668-869b-e5e6152c5641-image.png

    I have jsut an error of permission whe nI test to regenerate a Report because the script can’t access to log file

  • @DownPW what is the result of disabling it altogether? That will resolve the 503 rate limit error but could we leave the system exposed to bring overwhelmed.

    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW what is the result of disabling it altogether? That will resolve the 503 rate limit error but could we leave the system exposed to bring overwhelmed.

    Disabling What ? Traffic management? HSTS ?


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • What’s going on with NodeBB?

    Performance nodebb script die
    20
    8 Votes
    20 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlab
    @cagatay The most reliable way to upgrade Node.js on Ubuntu depends on how you originally installed it. Method 1: Using NVM (Recommended) If you already use Node Version Manager (NVM), upgrading is simple. NVM allows you to keep both versions and switch between them if needed. Install Node 22: nvm install 22 Switch to Node 22: nvm use 22 Set it as your default: nvm alias default 22 Verify the change: node -v Method 2: Using NodeSource (PPA) If you installed Node.js via apt using the NodeSource repository, you need to update the repository script to point to the new version. Remove the old NodeSource list (optional but cleaner): sudo rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/nodesource.list Download and run the NodeSource setup script for Node 22: curl -fsSL [https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_22.x](https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_22.x) | sudo -E bash - Install/Upgrade Node.js: sudo apt-get install -y nodejs Verify the installation: node -v Method 3: Using the ‘n’ Package If you have npm installed, you can use the n interactive manager. Clear the npm cache: sudo npm cache clean -f Install the ‘n’ helper: sudo npm install -g n Install Node 22: sudo n 22 Update your shell: hash -r Troubleshooting Permission Denied: If you see permission errors using Method 2 or 3, ensure you are using sudo. Path Issues: If node -v still shows version 20 after upgrading via NVM, restart your terminal or run source ~/.bashrc. Conflicts: Avoid mixing these methods. If you switch from apt to nvm, it is best to sudo apt remove nodejs first to avoid path conflicts.
  • Nodebb icon on google page

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    9
    1
    4 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda It’s been raised multiple times, but only for the open source version, and not hosted.
  • error with v3 in browser console

    Solved Performance socket error csrf
    4
    1
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW it’s in relation to the response I provided above
  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance nodebb seo
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365 And also https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164 It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”. Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.
  • build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

    Solved Performance nodebb
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.
  • Post Style View

    Solved Customisation post style sudonix nodebb
    67
    2
    18 Votes
    67 Posts
    35k Views
    DownPW
    @cagatay Just add margin-left on the element like @phenomlab said to you : topic [component="post/parent"] { margin-left: 10px; } [image: aa08c62b-4223-4cba-8c0f-c73d50474c0d-image.png] Maybe @phenomlab have a better way
  • background color of the footer area

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    7
    1
    7 Votes
    7 Posts
    4k Views
    crazycells
    @phenomlab thank you very much
  • NodeBB 1.19.3

    Solved Performance nodebb 1.19.3 performance
    33
    4 Votes
    33 Posts
    16k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab I find the problem Mark The error message indicated this path : http://localhost:4567/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/styles.css?v=6983dobg16u I change the path url on config.json [image: 47bacc80-f141-41e4-a261-3f8d650cc6f6-image.png] And all it’s good Weird, I didn’t have to change that path before 1.19.3 But this does not prevent the problem from a clean install with Emoji Plugin EDIT: After test, that resolv the problem installation for 1.18.x but not for 1.19.x (I have other error message when I run ./nodebb Setup For resume: NodeJS 16_x with 1.18.x is ok