Skip to content

NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

Solved Performance
69 3 62.9k 2
  • For your information @phenomlab ,

    • I have ban via iptables suspicious ip address find on /etc/nginx/accesss.log and virtualhost access.log like this : iptables -I INPUT -s IPADDRESS -j DROP
    • Activate bot option on CF
    • Create contry rules (Russie and China) on CF WAF
    • I left under attack mode option activated on CF
    • I have just change nginx.conf like this for test (If you have best value, I take it ! ) :
    worker_rlimit_nofile 70000; 
    
    events {
    
    	worker_connections 65535;
    	multi_accept on; 
    }
    
    http {
    
    	##
    	# Basic Settings
    	##
    
    	limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; 
    	limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; 
    	limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:10m; 
    	limit_conn ddos 100;
    

    100r/s iit’s already a lot !!

    and for vhost file :

    server {
    	.....
    
            location / {
    				
    				limit_req zone=flood; #Test 
    				limit_conn ddos 100; #Test 
    }
    

    –> If you have other ideas, I’m interested
    –> If you have better values ​​to use in what I modified, please let me know.

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #18

    @DownPW my only preference would be to not set worker_connections so high

  • @DownPW my only preference would be to not set worker_connections so high

    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @phenomlab

    Ok so what value do you advise?

  • @phenomlab

    Ok so what value do you advise?

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #20

    @DownPW you should base it on the output of ulimit - see below

    https://linuxhint.com/what-are-worker-connections-nginx/#:~:text=The worker_connections are the maximum,to accommodate a higher value

    With that high value you run the risk of overwhelming your server.

  • @DownPW you should base it on the output of ulimit - see below

    https://linuxhint.com/what-are-worker-connections-nginx/#:~:text=The worker_connections are the maximum,to accommodate a higher value

    With that high value you run the risk of overwhelming your server.

    wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #21

    @phenomlab

    Thanks mark 😉

    My ulimit is 1024, so I will set it to 1024

  • @phenomlab

    Thanks mark 😉

    My ulimit is 1024, so I will set it to 1024

    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @DownPW And the worker_processes value ? I expect this to be between 1 and 4 ?

  • @DownPW And the worker_processes value ? I expect this to be between 1 and 4 ?

    wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #23

    @phenomlab

    worker_processes auto;
    
  • @phenomlab

    worker_processes auto;
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @DownPW ok. You should refer to that some article I previously provided. You can probably set this to a static value.

  • @DownPW ok. You should refer to that some article I previously provided. You can probably set this to a static value.

    wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #25

    @phenomlab

    Ok I will see it for better worker_processes value

    I add a rate limite request and limit_conn_zone on http block and vhost block :

    – nginx.conf:

    http {
    
    	#Requete maximun par ip 
    	limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; 
    	#Connexions maximum par ip 
    	limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:1m;
    
    -- vhost.conf :
            location / {
    				
    				limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; 
    				limit_conn ddos 10;
    

    –> I have test other value for rate and burst but they cause problem access to the forum. If you have better, I take it

    I add today a proxy_read_timeout on vhost.conf (60 by default)

    proxy_read_timeout 180;
    

    I have deactivate underattack mode on CF and change for high Level

    I have add other rules on CF waf :

    9059db6c-f4f3-4415-bb47-ab88b2b41861-image.png

  • @phenomlab

    Ok I will see it for better worker_processes value

    I add a rate limite request and limit_conn_zone on http block and vhost block :

    – nginx.conf:

    http {
    
    	#Requete maximun par ip 
    	limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; 
    	#Connexions maximum par ip 
    	limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:1m;
    
    -- vhost.conf :
            location / {
    				
    				limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; 
    				limit_conn ddos 10;
    

    –> I have test other value for rate and burst but they cause problem access to the forum. If you have better, I take it

    I add today a proxy_read_timeout on vhost.conf (60 by default)

    proxy_read_timeout 180;
    

    I have deactivate underattack mode on CF and change for high Level

    I have add other rules on CF waf :

    9059db6c-f4f3-4415-bb47-ab88b2b41861-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @DownPW what settings do you have in advanced (in settings) for rate limit etc?

  • @DownPW what settings do you have in advanced (in settings) for rate limit etc?

    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW what settings do you have in advanced (in settings) for rate limit etc?

    In cloudflare ?

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #28

    @phenomlab

    I wanted to test awstats on virtualmin with root account and it hasn’t updated since August 2022.

    I wanted to regenerate the files but I have a problem of rights.

    df12b039-076d-4e64-9a8d-ad6580ed57dc-image.png
    4030eec2-29ce-4dcf-83f6-adc60f87be5e-image.png

    What do you think ? and how t ore-generate a rapport correctly

    I would like to use it to better manage the @ips that connect to the server

  • @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW what settings do you have in advanced (in settings) for rate limit etc?

    In cloudflare ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @DownPW no, sorry - in NodeBB ACP

  • @phenomlab

    I wanted to test awstats on virtualmin with root account and it hasn’t updated since August 2022.

    I wanted to regenerate the files but I have a problem of rights.

    df12b039-076d-4e64-9a8d-ad6580ed57dc-image.png
    4030eec2-29ce-4dcf-83f6-adc60f87be5e-image.png

    What do you think ? and how t ore-generate a rapport correctly

    I would like to use it to better manage the @ips that connect to the server

    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @DownPW from recollection, awstats is accessible via the web front end, so (for example) https://mydomain.com/awstats

    However, as you are pushing everything into a reverse proxy you’ll need to add a custom route in the nginx.conf file you are using on the website so this can be rendered outside of NodeBB.

  • @DownPW no, sorry - in NodeBB ACP

    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW no, sorry - in NodeBB ACP

    Here is the value

    28e6dd12-e727-4a6a-a06f-b7c7dd3ed431-image.png

  • @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW no, sorry - in NodeBB ACP

    Here is the value

    28e6dd12-e727-4a6a-a06f-b7c7dd3ed431-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @DownPW what is the result of disabling it altogether? That will resolve the 503 rate limit error but could we leave the system exposed to bring overwhelmed.

  • @DownPW what is the result of disabling it altogether? That will resolve the 503 rate limit error but could we leave the system exposed to bring overwhelmed.

    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @DownPW you should also review this

    https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/scaling/

    In particular, the part concerning proxied assets.

  • @DownPW from recollection, awstats is accessible via the web front end, so (for example) https://mydomain.com/awstats

    However, as you are pushing everything into a reverse proxy you’ll need to add a custom route in the nginx.conf file you are using on the website so this can be rendered outside of NodeBB.

    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW from recollection, awstats is accessible via the web front end, so (for example) https://mydomain.com/awstats

    However, as you are pushing everything into a reverse proxy you’ll need to add a custom route in the nginx.conf file you are using on the website so this can be rendered outside of NodeBB.

    Thats why I have a permission error like the screen? Odd

    Nope, Awstats is accessible like this via Virtualmin:

    https://XXXX:8443/virtualmin-awstats/view.cgi?config=XXXXXX.XX

    a3404ab3-4f2b-4623-9858-534ac8507bce-image.png
    7597a4ac-22e5-4cd6-884c-e149dcb6edbe-image.png
    f8285325-3072-4668-869b-e5e6152c5641-image.png

    I have jsut an error of permission whe nI test to regenerate a Report because the script can’t access to log file

  • @DownPW what is the result of disabling it altogether? That will resolve the 503 rate limit error but could we leave the system exposed to bring overwhelmed.

    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW what is the result of disabling it altogether? That will resolve the 503 rate limit error but could we leave the system exposed to bring overwhelmed.

    Disabling What ? Traffic management? HSTS ?

  • @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW from recollection, awstats is accessible via the web front end, so (for example) https://mydomain.com/awstats

    However, as you are pushing everything into a reverse proxy you’ll need to add a custom route in the nginx.conf file you are using on the website so this can be rendered outside of NodeBB.

    Thats why I have a permission error like the screen? Odd

    Nope, Awstats is accessible like this via Virtualmin:

    https://XXXX:8443/virtualmin-awstats/view.cgi?config=XXXXXX.XX

    a3404ab3-4f2b-4623-9858-534ac8507bce-image.png
    7597a4ac-22e5-4cd6-884c-e149dcb6edbe-image.png
    f8285325-3072-4668-869b-e5e6152c5641-image.png

    I have jsut an error of permission whe nI test to regenerate a Report because the script can’t access to log file

    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    Thats why I have a permission error like the screen? Odd

    No, not at all. That error is because www-data owns the files when it should be the account you are using to run the website itself under.

  • @DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    Thats why I have a permission error like the screen? Odd

    No, not at all. That error is because www-data owns the files when it should be the account you are using to run the website itself under.

    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    @phenomlab said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    Thats why I have a permission error like the screen? Odd

    No, not at all. That error is because www-data owns the files when it should be the account you are using to run the website itself under.

    I thought that was weird 😉

    strange than that.

    –> Would you have a solution so that I can regenerate the report and use awstats via virtualmin?


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Page control arrows for PWA

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    27
    25 Votes
    27 Posts
    15k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells it is, yes - I think I’ll leave it as there is no specific PWA CSS classes I know of. Well, you could use something like the below, but this means multiple CSS files for different operating systems. /** * Determine the mobile operating system. * This function returns one of 'iOS', 'Android', 'Windows Phone', or 'unknown'. * * @returns {String} */ function getMobileOperatingSystem() { var userAgent = navigator.userAgent || navigator.vendor || window.opera; // Windows Phone must come first because its UA also contains "Android" if (/windows phone/i.test(userAgent)) { return "Windows Phone"; } if (/android/i.test(userAgent)) { return "Android"; } if (/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(userAgent) && !window.MSStream) { return "iOS"; } return "unknown"; // return “Android” - one should either handle the unknown or fallback to a specific platform, let’s say Android } Once you’re in that rabbit hole, it’s impossible to get out of it.
  • error with v3 in browser console

    Solved Performance socket error csrf
    4
    1
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW it’s in relation to the response I provided above
  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance nodebb seo
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365 And also https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164 It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”. Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.
  • Composer Zen icon?

    Solved Configure nodebb
    8
    1
    2 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW exactly. Not really a new concept, and in all honesty, not something I’ve ever used. If you consider the need to add links and references, or citations, you’d need to be able to see other parts of the screen!
  • Further Widgets question

    Solved Configure nodebb
    4
    1
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda category is for a category in its own, so for example, “fruit” whereas categories is the page that contains all categories as a list.
  • NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

    Moved Performance nodebb v3 nodebb chat
    47
    11 Votes
    47 Posts
    21k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW Seems fine.
  • 36 Votes
    55 Posts
    30k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW I see why. The code relies on the existence of [component="topic/quickreply/container"] However, this by definition means that the below has to be enabled [image: aeef638f-4188-489d-a9f2-f3a26dbca9d8-image.png] It will then work [image: 7fb38631-e0f3-46ef-b652-00929d927b13-image.png] For some unknown reason, this is hidden in Harmony, and only shows if you select it. In v2, it seems that the <section> is deleted altogether in Persona if “Quick Reply” is disabled, meaning it won’t fire as it can’t locate that specific component. The downside is that you might not want the quick reply function, but I think it’s a PITA to scroll up to the top of the post just to reply, so I have it on
  • Adjusting the size of boxes in posts-list class

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    crazycells
    @phenomlab thanks a lot, this combination works best .posts-list .posts-list-item .content { overflow: auto; max-height: 600px; }