Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation
67 3 20.8k 2
  • @phenomlab yes i entered new topic and new post, seems everything is working great. thanks Mark…

    @cagatay Thanks for confirming. Just finishing up the jQuery functions so if you are logged in as admin, the page might reload a few times, but this is expected

  • @cagatay Thanks for confirming. Just finishing up the jQuery functions so if you are logged in as admin, the page might reload a few times, but this is expected

  • @cagatay Seems fine to me ?

    25678c08-ae90-4da6-95a5-c3b1229e7e08-image.png

  • @cagatay Seems fine to me ?

    25678c08-ae90-4da6-95a5-c3b1229e7e08-image.png

    @phenomlab pls refresh?

  • @cagatay I have. No issues on my side

  • @cagatay I have. No issues on my side

    @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

    @cagatay No problems. I checked this in an incognito session also, with no issues

    748735c8-4141-4185-9d46-4eb3f8023744-image.png

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

    @cagatay said in Post Style View:

    maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you

    One thing I have noticed is that there are a number of errors on your site in the console. My concern here is that the jQuery functions I added are not being executed. For example, I removed the below function from your site about 30 minutes ago because it’s malformed

    });ment).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
        	if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
        		var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
        		var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
        		tags.append(bar);
        		
        		var max;
        		
        		setTimeout(function() {
            		tags.each(function() {
            		   var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
            		   var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
            		   max = max > val ? max : val;
            		   
            		   bar.css({
            		       width: val / max * 100 + '%'
            		   });
            		});
        		}, 100)
        	}
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    As you can see, this isn’t right at all. It should be

    $(document).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
            if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
                var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
                var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
                tags.append(bar);
    
                var max;
    
                setTimeout(function () {
                    tags.each(function () {
                        var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
                        var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
                        max = max > val ? max : val;
    
                        bar.css({
                            width: val / max * 100 + '%'
                        });
                    });
                }, 100);
            }
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    I’ve put this back how it should be, but am curious as to where that came from.

  • @cagatay said in Post Style View:

    maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you

    One thing I have noticed is that there are a number of errors on your site in the console. My concern here is that the jQuery functions I added are not being executed. For example, I removed the below function from your site about 30 minutes ago because it’s malformed

    });ment).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
        	if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
        		var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
        		var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
        		tags.append(bar);
        		
        		var max;
        		
        		setTimeout(function() {
            		tags.each(function() {
            		   var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
            		   var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
            		   max = max > val ? max : val;
            		   
            		   bar.css({
            		       width: val / max * 100 + '%'
            		   });
            		});
        		}, 100)
        	}
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    As you can see, this isn’t right at all. It should be

    $(document).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
            if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
                var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
                var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
                tags.append(bar);
    
                var max;
    
                setTimeout(function () {
                    tags.each(function () {
                        var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
                        var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
                        max = max > val ? max : val;
    
                        bar.css({
                            width: val / max * 100 + '%'
                        });
                    });
                }, 100);
            }
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    I’ve put this back how it should be, but am curious as to where that came from.

    @phenomlab i can not understand how it can be, i do not touch anything js side.

    so now everything is working and code is okey hope so?

  • @phenomlab i can not understand how it can be, i do not touch anything js side.

    so now everything is working and code is okey hope so?

    @cagatay Not entirely. There is an ajax call I need to use called action:ajaxify.loaded but this does not seem to be firing on your site. It’s opposite, action:ajaxify.end works fine (as you’ll see if you press F5) but the former does not, and I can’t see any reason as to why.

  • @cagatay Not entirely. There is an ajax call I need to use called action:ajaxify.loaded but this does not seem to be firing on your site. It’s opposite, action:ajaxify.end works fine (as you’ll see if you press F5) but the former does not, and I can’t see any reason as to why.

    @phenomlab maybe it depends on my nodebb version or really i can not say anything coz i don not know what is the ajax code as well 🙂

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on my nodebb version or really i can not say anything coz i don not know what is the ajax code as well 🙂

    @cagatay Your NodeBB is up to date, so not an issue there. Just seems odd that no matter what I try, it doesn’t trigger. Investigating

  • @cagatay Your NodeBB is up to date, so not an issue there. Just seems odd that no matter what I try, it doesn’t trigger. Investigating

    @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

  • @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

    @cagatay Not sure, but will check out a theory I have first before we go down that route.

  • @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

    @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

  • @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

  • @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

    @cagatay Yes, but I want to create something more concise and simpler to follow

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Sudonix and fediverse

    Solved Customisation sudonix
    16
    4 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    @Panda said in Sudonix and fediverse: Federation will have huge advantages, especially for starting off forums that would otherwise be quiet, because it can bring in posts from similar sites to increase content. Can’t say I agree with this statement. To me, if I visit a new forum, I’d much rather be viewing original content rather than that which I can easily consume elsewhere. I understand that new forums are often empty with not much content, but the growth needs to be organic rather than ingested from elsewhere to make it look busy. Using RSS feeds to pull in content from remote sites is fine as long as you use it for reading reference and create a discussion around the topic you are referring to (as I do with Sudonix), but absolutely pointless if you include the entire article and all associated responses - you may as well just visit the origin site instead. Another issue is SEO and the impact duplicated content will have on your own forum when it comes to Google indexing your site. Duplicated content negatively impacts SEO and in addition, that same content may be proprietary meaning you need permission to include it on your site. Potentially, it’s a legal minefield which should be treated with trepidation to ensure no copyright infringement takes place.
  • 5 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    @DownPW thanks. I forgot about that.
  • Following the API docs but its not clear ...

    Solved Customisation api nodebb
    8
    2 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    @Panda you’d be surprised. If you consider that you’d need to use the API to be able to populate a WordPress widget for example (which in turn would of course be PHP), taking this route is still immensely popular.
  • Top Ranked Forums

    Chitchat nodebb top ranked
    9
    1
    3 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    The real issue here is that most people consider forums to be “dead” in the sense that nobody uses them anymore, and social media groups have taken their place. Their once dominant stance in the 90’s and early 00’s will never be experienced again, but having said that, there are a number of forums that did in fact survive the social media onslaught, and still enjoy a large user base. Forums tend to be niche. One that immediately sticks out is Reddit - despite looking like it was designed in the 80s, it still has an enormous user base. Another is Stack Overflow, which needs no introduction. The key to any forum is the content it offers, and the more people whom contribute in terms of posting , the more popular and widely respected it becomes as a reliable source of information. Forums are still intensely popular with gamers, alongside those that offer tips on hacking etc.
  • ineffecient use of space on mobile

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    10
    2
    7 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    @phenomlab Thanks
  • Adjusting the size of boxes in posts-list class

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    @phenomlab thanks a lot, this combination works best .posts-list .posts-list-item .content { overflow: auto; max-height: 600px; }
  • [NODEBB] Help for my custom CSS

    Solved Customisation nodebb css bugfix
    237
    49 Votes
    237 Posts
    100k Views
    @baris said: You should change your selectors so it doesn’t look at the entire document. You probably only want to apply fancybox to stuff inside the #content element which is what changes when the user navigates around the page. So use $('#content a').... for your selectors then the forum logo in the header won’t be selected. I modified the JS Fancybox code now and this code and it seem better // --------------------------------------------- // Fancybox Media Reader (Without Website Logo) // --------------------------------------------- if (top.location.pathname !== '/login') { $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) { console.log("Polling DOM for lazyLoaded images to apply Fancybox"); $(document).ready(function() { $('#content a').not('.forum-logo').not(".avatar").not(".emoji").not(".bmac-noanimate").each(function() { $('#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]').addClass("noanimate"); }); }); }); } if (top.location.pathname !== '/login') { $(document).ready(function() { $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) { $('#content a').not('.logo').not(".avatar").not(".emoji").not(".bmac-noanimate").each(function() { $('#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]').addClass("noanimate"); data.preventDefault() // Strip out the images contained inside blockquotes as this looks nasty :) $('#content blockquote img').remove(); }); Fancybox.bind( '#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]', { groupAll: true, } ); }); }); } // Chat fancybox - fires when chat module loaded and AJAX calls new chat $(document).ready(function() { $(window).on('action:chat.loaded', function(data) { // >>> Se limiter au contenu principal uniquement <<< $('#content img').not('.forum-logo').not(".avatar").not(".emoji").not(".bmac-noanimate").each(function() { var newHref = $(this).attr("src"); $(this).wrap("<a class='fancybox' href='" + newHref + "'/>"); $('#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]').addClass("noanimate"); data.preventDefault(); // Strip out the images contained inside blockquotes as this looks nasty :) $('#content blockquote img').remove(); }); Fancybox.bind( '#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]', { groupAll: true, } ); }); }); For the logo, I must use overflow: visible !important; on [component="brand/logo"] /* --- Logo --- */ [component="brand/logo"] { max-height: 50px; width: auto; height: auto; max-width: 100%; display: block; object-fit: contain; object-position: left center; overflow: visible !important; } Better result !!
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    @downpw I’m inclined to agree with this. There isn’t much else you can do, and provided it works with no odd looking artefacts in other browsers, then ok. The :before and :after are pseudo classes and very well supported across all browsers (except perhaps Internet Exploder, but who uses that these days ?)