Skip to content

NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

Moved Performance
47 3 20.9k 1
  • yep not box size but we don’t see the bug

    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @DownPW what exactly is the bug? I’ve tested it, and it behaves normally from what I see (unless I completely missed something)?

  • wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Size is good, is just the focus when we type text it has changed

    on 3.1.7 :

    image.png

    On 3.2.0 here :

    6e7b686d-031c-4e98-927e-a5df67906c25-image.png

  • Size is good, is just the focus when we type text it has changed

    on 3.1.7 :

    image.png

    On 3.2.0 here :

    6e7b686d-031c-4e98-927e-a5df67906c25-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @DownPW Yes, that’s input:focus - it’s used to style much larger boxes on focus, but I’ll need to create an exemption here.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Nodebb communauty :

    image.png

  • Nodebb communauty :

    image.png

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #40

    @DownPW @cagatay Thanks for reporting. Should match now.

    f99597be-2d44-4c14-a46d-c803de6d9347-image.png

  • wrote on last edited by
    #41

    yep better 🙂

    Solution ?

  • yep better 🙂

    Solution ?

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #42

    @DownPW As you indicated, but I need to make this more specific because it disables a wanted UI experience elsewhere

    .form-control:focus {
        background: var(--bs-body-bg) !important;
        color: var(--bs-body-color) !important;
        /*box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px var(--bs-tag-bg) inset !important; */
        border-color: transparent !important;
    }
    

    Starting with this CSS

    .form-control:focus {
        background: var(--bs-body-bg) !important;
        color: var(--bs-body-color) !important;
        border-color: transparent !important;
    }
    .write-container .form-control:focus {
        box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px var(--bs-tag-bg) inset !important;
    }
    
  • wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Have you find better solution or this is the final @phenomlab ?

  • Have you find better solution or this is the final @phenomlab ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @DownPW this is the final solution from my perspective. The above code resolves the issue here.

  • Have you find better solution or this is the final @phenomlab ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @DownPW i m also using last codes on my web site.

    .form-control:focus {
        background: var(--bs-body-bg) !important;
        color: var(--bs-body-color) !important;
        border-color: transparent !important;
    }
    .write-container .form-control:focus {
        box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px var(--bs-tag-bg) inset !important;
    }
    
  • wrote on last edited by
    #46

    I have search and I use this code. What do you think ?

    textarea.bg-transparent.text-body.form-control.chat-input.mousetrap.rounded-0.border-0.shadow-none.ps-1.py-0 {
        box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px transparent inset !important;
    }
    
  • I have search and I use this code. What do you think ?

    textarea.bg-transparent.text-body.form-control.chat-input.mousetrap.rounded-0.border-0.shadow-none.ps-1.py-0 {
        box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px transparent inset !important;
    }
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @DownPW Seems fine.


Related Topics
  • 3 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • navigation menu panel on mobile

    Solved Customisation nodebb css
    8
    1
    7 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells hmm. That’s odd. I haven’t made any changes from recollection but I could be wrong. I’ll need to check. EDIT - very strange. I honestly don’t recall adding the below CSS block to alter the bottom bar, but you’re right… .bottombar-nav { padding: 0px !important; } I’ve removed this so it reflects stock Harmony.
  • NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Solved Performance socket cloudflare nodebb
    24
    3 Votes
    24 Posts
    14k Views
    DownPW
    Solved. Tuto here and here
  • error with v3 in browser console

    Solved Performance socket error csrf
    4
    1
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW it’s in relation to the response I provided above
  • Email validation NodeBB

    Bugs nodebb
    21
    3 Votes
    21 Posts
    10k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Email validation NodeBB: Did you configure that as a custom change to the usual quote icon. How do you do that? I notice on NodeBB site its a solid blue quotes Yes, I changed it. NodeBB by default users the free font awesome library whereas I use the pro (paid) version SDK have access to a wider set of icons, and at different thicknesses etc. The change of colour is just simple CSS.
  • Optimum config for NodeBB under NGINX

    Performance nginx performance
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells hi - no security reason, or anything specific in this case. However, the nginx.conf I posted was from my Dev environment which uses this port as a way of not interfering with production. And yes, I use clustering on this site with three instances.
  • NodeBB Theme/Skin Switcher

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    38
    7 Votes
    38 Posts
    18k Views
    phenomlab
    @Teemberland great spot ! You should create a PR for that so they can include it in the official repository. Just be aware that any subsequent releases will overwrite your fix without the PR.
  • NodeBB 1.19.3

    Solved Performance nodebb 1.19.3 performance
    33
    4 Votes
    33 Posts
    16k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab I find the problem Mark The error message indicated this path : http://localhost:4567/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/styles.css?v=6983dobg16u I change the path url on config.json [image: 47bacc80-f141-41e4-a261-3f8d650cc6f6-image.png] And all it’s good Weird, I didn’t have to change that path before 1.19.3 But this does not prevent the problem from a clean install with Emoji Plugin EDIT: After test, that resolv the problem installation for 1.18.x but not for 1.19.x (I have other error message when I run ./nodebb Setup For resume: NodeJS 16_x with 1.18.x is ok