Skip to content

NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

Moved Performance
47 3 20.9k 1
  • wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Odd, node like that on nodebb communauty

  • Odd, node like that on nodebb communauty

    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @DownPW as I said previously, likely a regression introduced by 3.2.0

  • wrote on last edited by
    #32

    But nodebb forum communauty is on 3.2.0 no ?
    If yes, they don’t have this problem

  • wrote on last edited by
    #33

    They deactivate background and box shadow on nodebb communauty :

    image.png

  • They deactivate background and box shadow on nodebb communauty :

    image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @DownPW None of those will impact the box size. Let me have a look.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #35

    yep not box size but we don’t see the bug

  • yep not box size but we don’t see the bug

    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @DownPW what exactly is the bug? I’ve tested it, and it behaves normally from what I see (unless I completely missed something)?

  • wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Size is good, is just the focus when we type text it has changed

    on 3.1.7 :

    image.png

    On 3.2.0 here :

    6e7b686d-031c-4e98-927e-a5df67906c25-image.png

  • Size is good, is just the focus when we type text it has changed

    on 3.1.7 :

    image.png

    On 3.2.0 here :

    6e7b686d-031c-4e98-927e-a5df67906c25-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @DownPW Yes, that’s input:focus - it’s used to style much larger boxes on focus, but I’ll need to create an exemption here.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Nodebb communauty :

    image.png

  • Nodebb communauty :

    image.png

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #40

    @DownPW @cagatay Thanks for reporting. Should match now.

    f99597be-2d44-4c14-a46d-c803de6d9347-image.png

  • wrote on last edited by
    #41

    yep better 🙂

    Solution ?

  • yep better 🙂

    Solution ?

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #42

    @DownPW As you indicated, but I need to make this more specific because it disables a wanted UI experience elsewhere

    .form-control:focus {
        background: var(--bs-body-bg) !important;
        color: var(--bs-body-color) !important;
        /*box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px var(--bs-tag-bg) inset !important; */
        border-color: transparent !important;
    }
    

    Starting with this CSS

    .form-control:focus {
        background: var(--bs-body-bg) !important;
        color: var(--bs-body-color) !important;
        border-color: transparent !important;
    }
    .write-container .form-control:focus {
        box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px var(--bs-tag-bg) inset !important;
    }
    
  • wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Have you find better solution or this is the final @phenomlab ?

  • Have you find better solution or this is the final @phenomlab ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @DownPW this is the final solution from my perspective. The above code resolves the issue here.

  • Have you find better solution or this is the final @phenomlab ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @DownPW i m also using last codes on my web site.

    .form-control:focus {
        background: var(--bs-body-bg) !important;
        color: var(--bs-body-color) !important;
        border-color: transparent !important;
    }
    .write-container .form-control:focus {
        box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px var(--bs-tag-bg) inset !important;
    }
    
  • wrote on last edited by
    #46

    I have search and I use this code. What do you think ?

    textarea.bg-transparent.text-body.form-control.chat-input.mousetrap.rounded-0.border-0.shadow-none.ps-1.py-0 {
        box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px transparent inset !important;
    }
    
  • I have search and I use this code. What do you think ?

    textarea.bg-transparent.text-body.form-control.chat-input.mousetrap.rounded-0.border-0.shadow-none.ps-1.py-0 {
        box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px transparent inset !important;
    }
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @DownPW Seems fine.


Related Topics
  • 4 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    crazycells
    thanks @DownPW ! this is definitely very helpful.
  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance nodebb seo
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365 And also https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164 It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”. Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.
  • Smart Widgets

    Solved Configure nodebb
    9
    3 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Smart Widgets: So why is that, or conversely why would the function to expose username ever be required, as it seems app.user is already an available global object? It is, yes, but not if you are using it outside of a widget. The function I wrote is also historical and comes from the 2.x train
  • 19 Votes
    21 Posts
    12k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells this perhaps? [image: terminator_endoskeleton_1020.webp]
  • NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

    Solved Performance performance nodebb nginx
    69
    4
    14 Votes
    69 Posts
    63k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab Seems to be better with some scaling fix for redis on redis.conf. I haven’t seen the message yet since the changes I made # I increase it to the value of /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn tcp-backlog 4096 # I'm uncommenting because it can slow down Redis. Uncommented by default !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #save 900 1 #save 300 10 #save 60 10000 If you have other Redis optimizations. I take all your advice https://severalnines.com/blog/performance-tuning-redis/
  • Custom badges

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    103
    2
    49 Votes
    103 Posts
    60k Views
    DownPW
    Perfect
  • Bootstrap Version

    Solved Customisation nodebb bootstrap
    8
    5 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    Madchatthew
    @phenomlab That will be nice once they have completed that. It will be interesting to see how long that takes. So for now I will use custom css to make it look the way I want. Frameworks just make things a little faster. Thanks @phenomlab
  • [NODEBB] Wallpapers BUG on Firefox Mobile ?

    Solved Customisation nodebb wallpaper firefox mobile
    9
    1
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @downpw I’m inclined to agree with this. There isn’t much else you can do, and provided it works with no odd looking artefacts in other browsers, then ok. The :before and :after are pseudo classes and very well supported across all browsers (except perhaps Internet Exploder, but who uses that these days ?)