Skip to content

[NODEBB] Wallpapers BUG on Firefox Mobile ?

Solved Customisation
9 2 3.0k 1
  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #1

    Hello @phenomlab

    My wallpapers works great on Chrome, Vivaldi, Brave on mobile but no on firefox.
    If I don’t scroll the page, wallpaper is OK. If i scroll on a category with lot of topics, i have a black color at the bottom of the sreeen after the wallpeper.

    ONLY on FIREFOX

    I have this code :

    /* Smartphone */
    @media (min-width: 320px) {
            body {
            background: url(https://domain.com/assets/customcss/backgrounds/default/default_01.png) no-repeat center center fixed; /*Background01*/
            -webkit-background-size: cover;
            -moz-background-size: cover;
            -o-background-size: cover;
            background-size: cover;
            background-color: transparent !important; 
        }
    }
    

    -moz-background-size: cover is declared for Gecho but I have this :

    d9b8067c-4943-47e7-83b7-73406fcc4524-image.png

    Thanks 😉

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #2

    @phenomlab

    I have fixed the bug with a body: after like this :

    /* Smartphone */
    @media (min-width: 320px) {
            body {
            background: url(https://XXXX.XXX/assets/customcss/backgrounds/default/default_01.png) no-repeat center center scroll; /*Background01*/
            -webkit-background-size: cover;
            -moz-background-size: cover;
            -o-background-size: cover;
            background-size: cover;
            background-color: transparent !important; 
        }
        
        body:after{
          content:"";
          position:fixed; /* stretch a fixed position to the whole screen */
          top:0;
          height:100vh; /* fix for mobile browser address bar appearing disappearing */
          left:0;
          right:0;
          z-index:-1; /* needed to keep in the background */
          background: url(https://XXXX.XXXX/assets/customcss/backgrounds/default/default_01.png) center center;
          -webkit-background-size: cover;
          -moz-background-size: cover;
          -o-background-size: cover;
          background-size: cover;
          background-color: transparent !important; 
    }  
    }
    

    But I don’t know if this is a good solution.

    What do you think ?

    Could it be simpler than that?

  • @phenomlab

    I have fixed the bug with a body: after like this :

    /* Smartphone */
    @media (min-width: 320px) {
            body {
            background: url(https://XXXX.XXX/assets/customcss/backgrounds/default/default_01.png) no-repeat center center scroll; /*Background01*/
            -webkit-background-size: cover;
            -moz-background-size: cover;
            -o-background-size: cover;
            background-size: cover;
            background-color: transparent !important; 
        }
        
        body:after{
          content:"";
          position:fixed; /* stretch a fixed position to the whole screen */
          top:0;
          height:100vh; /* fix for mobile browser address bar appearing disappearing */
          left:0;
          right:0;
          z-index:-1; /* needed to keep in the background */
          background: url(https://XXXX.XXXX/assets/customcss/backgrounds/default/default_01.png) center center;
          -webkit-background-size: cover;
          -moz-background-size: cover;
          -o-background-size: cover;
          background-size: cover;
          background-color: transparent !important; 
    }  
    }
    

    But I don’t know if this is a good solution.

    What do you think ?

    Could it be simpler than that?

    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @downpw This looks extremely complex. I think you should be looking at background-repeat - see https://www.w3schools.com/CSSref/pr_background-repeat.asp

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #4

    I will test soon and let you know if it’s ok

    like this ?

    /* Smartphone */
    @media (min-width: 320px) {
            body {
            background-image: url(https://XXXX.XXX/assets/customcss/backgrounds/default/default_01.png) 
            background-repeat: repeat-y
            -webkit-background-size: cover;
            -moz-background-size: cover;
            -o-background-size: cover;
            background-size: cover;
            background-color: transparent !important; 
        }
    }
    
  • I will test soon and let you know if it’s ok

    like this ?

    /* Smartphone */
    @media (min-width: 320px) {
            body {
            background-image: url(https://XXXX.XXX/assets/customcss/backgrounds/default/default_01.png) 
            background-repeat: repeat-y
            -webkit-background-size: cover;
            -moz-background-size: cover;
            -o-background-size: cover;
            background-size: cover;
            background-color: transparent !important; 
        }
    }
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @downpw yes, that should work, but you probably need to experiment to get the best results.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @phenomlab

    Thats works but It’s really not very pretty 😞

    The code I have find on the web is complex, but it do the job perfectly.

    The result is exactly the same on Chrome based browsers and Firefox Mobile.
    and that’s what I’m looking for because I have a lot of FF users on mobile.

    I don’t understand why Firefox Mobile doesn’t interpret this code the same way.

    It is very frustrating 😞

    If you have better for the same result, I’m a taker of course 🙂

  • @phenomlab

    Thats works but It’s really not very pretty 😞

    The code I have find on the web is complex, but it do the job perfectly.

    The result is exactly the same on Chrome based browsers and Firefox Mobile.
    and that’s what I’m looking for because I have a lot of FF users on mobile.

    I don’t understand why Firefox Mobile doesn’t interpret this code the same way.

    It is very frustrating 😞

    If you have better for the same result, I’m a taker of course 🙂

    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @downpw this is very odd. Firefox uses the Gecko engine and Chrome uses WebKit. They aren’t too far apart in terms of standards, so it should be the same across browsers.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #8

    the code which is complex does the job.

    He remove the black bar without repeating the wallpaper.

    I had trouble finding this code.

    A lot of people have the same problem apparently under Firefox Mobile app. On firefox desktop app, it’s OK.

    This is really a specificity of the mobile version.
    Maybe on the renderer.

  • the code which is complex does the job.

    He remove the black bar without repeating the wallpaper.

    I had trouble finding this code.

    A lot of people have the same problem apparently under Firefox Mobile app. On firefox desktop app, it’s OK.

    This is really a specificity of the mobile version.
    Maybe on the renderer.

    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @downpw I’m inclined to agree with this. There isn’t much else you can do, and provided it works with no odd looking artefacts in other browsers, then ok. The :before and :after are pseudo classes and very well supported across all browsers (except perhaps Internet Exploder, but who uses that these days ?)

  • phenomlab phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • 4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    crazycells
    @phenomlab oh no, that is 1 cent on the video, but you are right, symbols are similar… I just converted it to $1 , since it is more intuitive in daily life…
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • Forum Icons NodeBB

    Solved Customisation icons forum nodebb
    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlab
    @cagatay That matches what I see [image: 4f0f858d-9812-42b1-9f61-ffb13d31dccd-image.png]
  • How to downgrade plugin version on NodeBB

    Solved Customisation downgrade nodebb
    11
    3 Votes
    11 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlab
    @cagatay no problems
  • NodeBB inline videoplayer

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    12
    3 Votes
    12 Posts
    5k Views
    Panda
    @phenomlab YAY! It works Thanks so much
  • [NODEBB] Stats

    Unsolved Customisation plugin stats script
    20
    1
    2 Votes
    20 Posts
    6k Views
    JAC
    @phenomlab said in [NODEBB] Stats: @jac or I land up fixing it I wouldn’t put it past you
  • [NodeBB] username cards

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    8
    5 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    Sampo2910
    @phenomlab Aha…nice to know. As always thank you for the reply and information.
  • Which mobile internet app and browser do you use?

    General browser mobile
    9
    3 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @Sala Yes, I personally use Edge. Hated Internet Exploder (misspell intentional) but seeing as Edge is Chromium and Webkit backed, it works for me.