Skip to content

Switch between list and card view function

Moved Let's Build It
107 4 56.6k 1
  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #40

    yes the bug is in my dev environment

  • yes the bug is in my dev environment

    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @DownPW yes, correct.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #42

    yes the bug is in my dev environment. tested now

  • yes the bug is in my dev environment. tested now

    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @DownPW it wasn’t there when I tested incognito.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #44

    I do all my tets in incognito too
    I will test with another account

    You must scroll down a little to see

  • I do all my tets in incognito too
    I will test with another account

    You must scroll down a little to see

    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @DownPW I scrolled through but found no issues

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #46

    yes same with admin account in new incognito

    image.png

  • yes same with admin account in new incognito

    image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @DownPW can you target both the correctly positioned elements and the incorrectly positioned and compare the results?

    I’m guessing they are different, but shouldn’t be.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #48

    correctly positionned :

    891bb641-cfbc-4e49-aa8f-ddc3466a9fd7-image.png
    428e9115-7af1-4043-8685-91332636dbb1-image.png

    incorrectly positioned :

    07648995-1a18-445e-b3e1-64cad7f8a89c-image.png
    5ba06a13-8122-4ac1-9cd1-f24733546cfe-image.png

  • correctly positionned :

    891bb641-cfbc-4e49-aa8f-ddc3466a9fd7-image.png
    428e9115-7af1-4043-8685-91332636dbb1-image.png

    incorrectly positioned :

    07648995-1a18-445e-b3e1-64cad7f8a89c-image.png
    5ba06a13-8122-4ac1-9cd1-f24733546cfe-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @DownPW so the class isn’t being applied. Thanks. Let me have another look at this.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @DownPW from my further testing, this is 100% CF, but I don’t know why. I’ve tried Page Rules, Cache Rules, setting security in the page rules to “Essentially Off” - nothing seems to work (for me at least). I’ve stripped back my testing domain and disabled CF completely, and everything works as intended.

    I was never able to reproduce the issue here, and that’s because I don’t use CF !

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #51

    Too bad. I will therefore not be able to use this function or perhaps by just deleting the problematic avatar if that is possible

  • Too bad. I will therefore not be able to use this function or perhaps by just deleting the problematic avatar if that is possible

    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    @DownPW you could use `display: none’ to hide that specific class? I do intend to try and identify the issue with CF but it’s difficult because I don’t traditionally use it.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #53

    I can possibly use this code if you find a solution (or not)
    With just a left border on post-content

    .category-card .lastpost .post-content {
        border-left: 2px solid grey;
    }
    
    .category-card .lastpost a img {
        display: none;
    }
    
    .category-card .line-clamp-sm-2 {
        margin-left: 38px !important;
    }
    

    Result :

    8235af26-ad1f-49de-8463-27314ed8d0bb-image.png

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #54

    hmmm, on my website, in fact the elements on the class have not been applied are still displayed 😞

    c5b2d73d-de9f-4fa7-ab4f-fcc6ab610549-image.png

    Is there a way to prevent them from showing up either?

  • I can possibly use this code if you find a solution (or not)
    With just a left border on post-content

    .category-card .lastpost .post-content {
        border-left: 2px solid grey;
    }
    
    .category-card .lastpost a img {
        display: none;
    }
    
    .category-card .line-clamp-sm-2 {
        margin-left: 38px !important;
    }
    

    Result :

    8235af26-ad1f-49de-8463-27314ed8d0bb-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #55

    @DownPW that looks really good!

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #56

    hmm no @phenomlab
    it’s ok on your site but not on mine 😞

    look at the screens above


    if I not display this class too, I have no avatar on all the site because it’s the original class .

    In fact I can’t do anything. In all cases, avatars with the wrong location are displayed in the same way

    or you would have to make sure that this element never appears with card view on this page but I’m not even sure that would work

  • wrote on last edited by
    #57

    if you have solution for me, I take it

  • if you have solution for me, I take it

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #58

    @DownPW I’ll need to put something together based on your dev site.

    EDIT: If you have a look at sudonix.dev (closed dev site, so you’ll need to login) you’ll see that this is no longer exposed to CF, and works as intended.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #59

    Yes I believe you that it works without CF 🙂

    I would just like to see if a solution is possible with CF even if it means deleting this d**n avatar on post-content


Related Topics
  • 2 Votes
    1 Posts
    640 Views
    No one has replied
  • Ch..ch..ch..ch..changes!

    Announcements themes layout
    16
    2
    15 Votes
    16 Posts
    5k Views
    JAC
    @phenomlab of course, to be recognised is fantastic. @phenomlab said in Ch..ch..ch..ch..changes!: Sadly, no. Web crawlers and scrapers are often JS based and read text only, so styles don’t have any bearing. I’ve read mixed things about this, but no that does make sense, it was something I read a many years back when using Wordpress.
  • Extended functions for Q&A NodeBB plugin

    Let's Build It q&a panels cards
    3
    4
    5 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    DownPW
    Very good like always
  • navigation menu panel on mobile

    Solved Customisation nodebb css
    8
    1
    7 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells hmm. That’s odd. I haven’t made any changes from recollection but I could be wrong. I’ll need to check. EDIT - very strange. I honestly don’t recall adding the below CSS block to alter the bottom bar, but you’re right… .bottombar-nav { padding: 0px !important; } I’ve removed this so it reflects stock Harmony.
  • Create a dynamic category list

    Moved Let's Build It dynamic categories api
    16
    3
    14 Votes
    16 Posts
    7k Views
    phenomlab
    Hmm - seems I never committed this code. I’ll do that now… EDIT - here it is https://github.com/phenomlab/category-list/tree/main
  • Footer bar add center text

    Solved Customisation css
    41
    1
    8 Votes
    41 Posts
    19k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab said in Footer bar add center text: div#console-nav-tab Ah ok test with bottom: 0px !important; idem
  • Bottom footer navbar button extend

    Solved Customisation css javascript customisation footer navbar
    32
    9 Votes
    32 Posts
    15k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW said in Bottom footer navbar button extend: Oh my god, it’s beautiful mark I liked this design so much, I’ve implemented it here. I intend to do a lot more with the footer in due course, so hiding it makes a lot of sense. Thanks @DownPW for the idea and initial concept
  • CSS Help on my Flarum

    Solved Customisation
    5
    2
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @mike-jones Yes, you’ll typically see this type of behaviour if there is another style that has higher priority in the sense that yours will be overridden. Using !important will override the higher preference, but should be used sparingly rather than everywhere.