Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation
67 3 16.3k 2
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

  • @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

  • @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

    @cagatay Yes, but I want to create something more concise and simpler to follow

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.end’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.loaded’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });

    thank you Mark.
    changed it.

  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

  • @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

    @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.

  • @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.

    @phenomlab may i use this code?

    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"] {
        float: left;
    }
    // Add these to (or edit) the existing classes you have
    .user-level-topic {
        float: none;
    }
    .group-label {
        margin-top: -1px;
    }
    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"]:after {
        margin-top: 1px;
        height: 18px;
    }
    
  • @phenomlab may i use this code?

    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"] {
        float: left;
    }
    // Add these to (or edit) the existing classes you have
    .user-level-topic {
        float: none;
    }
    .group-label {
        margin-top: -1px;
    }
    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"]:after {
        margin-top: 1px;
        height: 18px;
    }
    

    @cagatay from the screenshot you provided, it looks like you’ve used them. They are fine to use, but you are missing a couple of styles.

    I’ll have a look at this tomorrow and give you the remainder of the code you need.

  • @cagatay from the screenshot you provided, it looks like you’ve used them. They are fine to use, but you are missing a couple of styles.

    I’ll have a look at this tomorrow and give you the remainder of the code you need.

    @phenomlab i cant fix it 😞

    0ec83f76-a140-46dc-9a9f-b4f6f3d98b9c-image.png

  • @phenomlab i cant fix it 😞

    0ec83f76-a140-46dc-9a9f-b4f6f3d98b9c-image.png

    @cagatay

    Just add margin-left on the element like @phenomlab said to you :

    topic [component="post/parent"] {
        margin-left: 10px;
    }
    

    aa08c62b-4223-4cba-8c0f-c73d50474c0d-image.png

    Maybe @phenomlab have a better way


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • 2 Votes
    94 Posts
    12k Views
    @willi@social.tchncs.de a VPS can be had from DigitalOcean or Vultr quite economically (although I know that isn’t always the case in some countries) You can also use our referral link for an account credit too!
  • 5 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    @DownPW thanks. I forgot about that.
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    844 Views
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • Difficult to move posts now, on mobile.

    Bugs nodebb
    16
    1
    5 Votes
    16 Posts
    3k Views
    @DownPW Yes, it is. It’s set far too low meaning other elements with a higher preference will sit over the top of it.
  • Further Widgets question

    Solved Configure nodebb
    4
    1
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    830 Views
    @Panda category is for a category in its own, so for example, “fruit” whereas categories is the page that contains all categories as a list.
  • restarting nodebb on boot

    Unsolved Configure nodebb
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    @eeeee said in restarting nodebb on boot: can I just run nodebb under nodemon for auto restarts? It’s a better method. Nodemon just looks for file system changes and would effectively die if the server was rebooted meaning you’d have to start it again anyway. Systemd is the defacto standard which is how the operating system interacts in terms of services, scheduled tasks etc.
  • Detect if user is admin

    General nodebb javascript code
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    @pwsincd I think you can use userData.isAdmin = isAdmin; if I’m not mistaken - see https://community.nodebb.org/topic/15128/how-to-hide-whitelist-user-field-only-to-owner-or-admin?_=1648802303112 for an example
  • is "night mode" shifting the forum several pixels up?

    Solved Configure nodebb
    8
    4 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    @crazycells hmm. Good point. I actually use my own version of the dark mode plugin, so not entirely sure. However, I think the CSS is probably the same. I’m not at my PC currently but can check and advise later.