Skip to content

DNS record invalid (Google webmaster)

Solved Hosting
13 3 4.3k 1
  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #1

    I’m trying to submit the sitemap to Google and have created a TXT record in the DNS settings, it’s not accepting it for some reason, I keep getting the error as shown below.

    Many thanks

    IMG_20211010_221129.jpg

  • JAC JAC

    Thanks fellas 👍🏻

    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    I can confirm the site is now verified and the sitemap has been submitted.

    Thanks chaps @gotwf @phenomlab

  • JAC JAC

    I’m trying to submit the sitemap to Google and have created a TXT record in the DNS settings, it’s not accepting it for some reason, I keep getting the error as shown below.

    Many thanks

    IMG_20211010_221129.jpg

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #2

    @jac loojs like the record isn’t setup correctly. Can you provide the steps taken ?

    The only TXT record is what is shown here

  • JAC JAC

    I’m trying to submit the sitemap to Google and have created a TXT record in the DNS settings, it’s not accepting it for some reason, I keep getting the error as shown below.

    Many thanks

    IMG_20211010_221129.jpg

    wrote on last edited by
    #3
    This post is deleted!
  • [[topic:post-is-deleted]]
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @gotwf the domain you’ve referenced belongs to @justoverclock and not @JAC 👍

  • @gotwf the domain you’ve referenced belongs to @justoverclock and not @JAC 👍

    wrote on last edited by gotwf
    #5

    @phenomlab lol!!! 🤦

    Well, I guess that is what happens when I try to use my brain too soon after waking up from a Sunday nap…

    And just for the heck of it;

    drill stockportcounty.fans soa 
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, rcode: NOERROR, id: 11467
    ;; flags: qr rd ra ; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;; stockportcounty.fans.	IN	SOA
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    stockportcounty.fans.	600	IN	SOA	maceio.porkbun.com. support.porkbun.com. 1 10800 3600 604800 600
    
    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    
    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
    
    ;; Query time: 311 msec
    ;; SERVER: 192.168.27.1
    ;; WHEN: Sun Oct 10 19:21:55 2021
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 100
    

    Serial # of “1” is unusual. Typically we use date in year,month,day form (sans any commas) followed by a number, e.g. 00, 01 in case we need to make multiple updates per day.

    But the real reason I posted follow up… to give porkbun a plug! GKG.net, my preferred registrar these past twenty years or so was once upon a time just dandy. Then they were not. I put up with declining customer service (something I rarely need so I can only imagine how bad it became for those who did) before finally going shopping. One of my “tests” is for an actual phone number (cuz if I need support I do not want to be putzing about with chat). Then I call that number: How long before if/when a live human answers? Are they native English speakers or offshore? Do they have a technical clue or two or merely following some script to see where to route you? Stuff like thatl. Settled on Porkbun. Ticked all my boxes. Been using them for just over a year or so? Could not be happier. Competitive pricing and stellar support (at least for now… ).

    Now I shall delete my brain fart post…

  • @jac loojs like the record isn’t setup correctly. Can you provide the steps taken ?

    The only TXT record is what is shown here

    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @phenomlab said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    @jac loojs like the record isn’t setup correctly. Can you provide the steps taken ?

    The only TXT record is what is shown here

    Sure mate, I’ll send it later once on the laptop 👍🏻

  • JAC JAC

    @phenomlab said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    @jac loojs like the record isn’t setup correctly. Can you provide the steps taken ?

    The only TXT record is what is shown here

    Sure mate, I’ll send it later once on the laptop 👍🏻

    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @jac said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    @phenomlab said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    @jac loojs like the record isn’t setup correctly. Can you provide the steps taken ?

    The only TXT record is what is shown here

    Sure mate, I’ll send it later once on the laptop 👍🏻

    I logged into VirtualMin > DNS > selected TXT record and added “google-site-verification=FkY98iOTmkSVm3k11bIeH9ZHOKRgMQLnQyyGdLBHuXE” and then added the record.

    Probably done it wrong 😑

  • JAC JAC

    @jac said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    @phenomlab said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    @jac loojs like the record isn’t setup correctly. Can you provide the steps taken ?

    The only TXT record is what is shown here

    Sure mate, I’ll send it later once on the laptop 👍🏻

    I logged into VirtualMin > DNS > selected TXT record and added “google-site-verification=FkY98iOTmkSVm3k11bIeH9ZHOKRgMQLnQyyGdLBHuXE” and then added the record.

    Probably done it wrong 😑

    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @jac That’s not where it goes. You need to add this record at the registrar for the domain, so in this case, Porkbun

  • @jac That’s not where it goes. You need to add this record at the registrar for the domain, so in this case, Porkbun

    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @phenomlab said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    @jac That’s not where it goes. You need to add this record at the registrar for the domain, so in this case, Porkbun

    B****r, don’t I feel daft 🙈🙈

  • JAC JAC

    @phenomlab said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    @jac That’s not where it goes. You need to add this record at the registrar for the domain, so in this case, Porkbun

    B****r, don’t I feel daft 🙈🙈

    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @jac Hey mon! We’ve all been there. And done that. Unless yer’ a complete and total newbie. 🐕

  • @jac Hey mon! We’ve all been there. And done that. Unless yer’ a complete and total newbie. 🐕

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #11

    @gotwf said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    We’ve all been there. And done that

    Yep !! On production networks, too !! 👀

  • @gotwf said in DNS record invalid (Google webmaster):

    We’ve all been there. And done that

    Yep !! On production networks, too !! 👀

    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Thanks fellas 👍🏻

  • JAC JAC

    Thanks fellas 👍🏻

    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    I can confirm the site is now verified and the sitemap has been submitted.

    Thanks chaps @gotwf @phenomlab

  • phenomlab phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Email Service Recommendation

    Unsolved Hosting email service 3rd party selfhosted
    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    591 Views
    JAC
    I use Proton Mail mostly and recommend it. There’s some good alternatives here though - https://europealternative.com/category/email-communication/ https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/1vrrml3/what_is_a_good_email_provider/
  • 1 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab said: If you bypass or disable cloudflare, does the problem subside? I will test that tonight. I have create waf rules on CF and page rule for ignore socket.io… [image: e1ff1160-846d-4aad-ab06-5070485b0f43-image.jpeg] [image: 577c9be8-cec3-4b81-b0a5-8b9c315eabee-image.jpeg]
  • Is no cpanel on host normal?

    Solved Hosting hosting
    8
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda if just seems bizarre practice to me. They clearly state that cPanel comes with the package, yet don’t seem to offer it unless you complain it’s missing!
  • 3 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW said in Nginx core developer quits project in security dispute, starts “freenginx” fork: Maybe virtualmin implement it in the future… I don’t think they will - my guess is that they will stick with the current branch of NGINX. I’ve not personally tested it, but the GIT page seems to be very active. This is equally impressive [image: 8ac0d197-68fa-4bd8-bfa3-87237bf8f1f4-image.png] I think the most impressive on here is the native support of HTTP 3
  • Come back PhP, all is forgiven!

    Hosting nodejs
    14
    9 Votes
    14 Posts
    4k Views
    Madchatthew
    @phenomlab yes I 100% agree with you!
  • VPS Provider

    Solved Hosting vps provider
    7
    6 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    Madchatthew
    @phenomlab thank you very much. I will use that link when I set up my new server. Thanks again!
  • Domain name factors

    Hosting domain name
    16
    1 Votes
    16 Posts
    5k Views
    JAC
    @phenomlab said in Domain name factors: @jac Yes, but don’t forget that Matomo (and most browsers) alike will allow you to “opt out” or not be tracked, so you can’t really rely on these 100%. Absolutely, very true pal.
  • 3 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @cagatay same here. Was previously an IONOS user, but moved to Hetzner to realise both savings and performance increase and have never looked back.