Skip to content

NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

Solved Performance
24 3 14.3k 1
  • wrote on last edited by
    #14

    ???

  • I see this on start log nodebb

    e5fc0e62-fa92-461d-9bfe-2b2b9ace2232-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @DownPW Now working for me in Incognito. Can you check

  • There’s more of an issue here - try to change any CSS or JS in the ACP, and you’ll see that it does not save.

    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @phenomlab said in NodeBB socket with CloudFlare:

    There’s more of an issue here - try to change any CSS or JS in the ACP, and you’ll see that it does not save.

    due to socket.io configuration in nodebb config.json file

    Actually I have delete socket.io block and change CSS and save is good.

  • @phenomlab said in NodeBB socket with CloudFlare:

    There’s more of an issue here - try to change any CSS or JS in the ACP, and you’ll see that it does not save.

    due to socket.io configuration in nodebb config.json file

    Actually I have delete socket.io block and change CSS and save is good.

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #17

    @DownPW Ok, but that now means you should not need the socket A record anymore because it’s not used. From the logs, the socket is running on the site’s URL.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #18

    normal that it is not used (A record) @phenomlab because there currently, I do not use it because the socket.io block is removed from config.json.

    I’m just in normal mode with Cloudflare :

    5272437e-9b74-4482-881a-5c376cf73900-image.png

    I can put it back if you want ?

  • normal that it is not used (A record) @phenomlab because there currently, I do not use it because the socket.io block is removed from config.json.

    I’m just in normal mode with Cloudflare :

    5272437e-9b74-4482-881a-5c376cf73900-image.png

    I can put it back if you want ?

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #19

    @DownPW It seems to be working fine without it, so I’d leave it. I see zero socket errors, so all good.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #20

    because I’m alone on the server.

    The goal is to try to market this method before putting it into production where i have a lot of errors

    And we can see that it doesn’t work when I try to reroute the web sockets in non-proxied mode. (socket error, no save when chnage in ACP, etc…)

    I don’t know if I can make myself understood. @phenomlab 🙂

  • because I’m alone on the server.

    The goal is to try to market this method before putting it into production where i have a lot of errors

    And we can see that it doesn’t work when I try to reroute the web sockets in non-proxied mode. (socket error, no save when chnage in ACP, etc…)

    I don’t know if I can make myself understood. @phenomlab 🙂

    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @DownPW Understood. Even with just the two of us connected, I was still getting the websocket error, but I think that was related to config etc. In all honesty, this is yet another reason why I stopped using CF. I know you need it to hide your IP address, but if you bypass CF for the socket, you are exposing your IP anyway.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #22

    I know, I know,

    too bad… I just wanted to test this method but it seems more complex than it looks to make it work correctly

    The reverse proxy method is currently too expensive for me and technically too abstract

  • I know, I know,

    too bad… I just wanted to test this method but it seems more complex than it looks to make it work correctly

    The reverse proxy method is currently too expensive for me and technically too abstract

    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @DownPW it’s your only realistic option at this stage.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Solved. Tuto here and here

  • DownPW DownPW has marked this topic as solved on

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • 4 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    crazycells
    thanks @DownPW ! this is definitely very helpful.
  • Custom Page - nodebb

    Solved Customisation custom-pages nodebb
    13
    2
    5 Votes
    13 Posts
    3k Views
    DownPW
    I’m happy to see this
  • Block Domain

    Solved Let's Build It code javascript block domain nodebb
    26
    1 Votes
    26 Posts
    11k Views
    DownPW
    Yes ogproxy too is functionnal on dev
  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance nodebb seo
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365 And also https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164 It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”. Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.
  • Optimum config for NodeBB under NGINX

    Performance nginx performance
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells hi - no security reason, or anything specific in this case. However, the nginx.conf I posted was from my Dev environment which uses this port as a way of not interfering with production. And yes, I use clustering on this site with three instances.
  • NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

    Solved Performance performance nodebb nginx
    69
    4
    14 Votes
    69 Posts
    63k Views
    DownPW
    @phenomlab Seems to be better with some scaling fix for redis on redis.conf. I haven’t seen the message yet since the changes I made # I increase it to the value of /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn tcp-backlog 4096 # I'm uncommenting because it can slow down Redis. Uncommented by default !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #save 900 1 #save 300 10 #save 60 10000 If you have other Redis optimizations. I take all your advice https://severalnines.com/blog/performance-tuning-redis/
  • NodeBB inline videoplayer

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    12
    3 Votes
    12 Posts
    5k Views
    Panda
    @phenomlab YAY! It works Thanks so much
  • 1 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @qwinter yes, I recently migrated this site to CF in full and noticed the same thing. Seems CF also has native socket support now under the free plan, so win/win. I’ve not noticed any degradation of service since moving so happy to stay put for the time being.