Skip to content

Which Swatch are you using or prefer?

Announcements
8 2 1.2k 1

Related Topics
  • Planned sunset of NTFY plugin

    Pinned Announcements push nodebb ntfy
    7
    1
    8 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    I’ve noticed that I’m the only one subscribed to the push notifications on this site. If you were using NTFY previously, and have noticed that you’ve not had any alerts for a while, it’s because this feature has been disabled. You’ll now need to use the push notification to replace NTFY as mentioned in the first post.
  • ANNOUCEMENT: New NTFY Server

    Announcements ntfy push alerts
    9
    1
    7 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    @crazycells that’s as good a test as any
  • Swatch / Theme Changer

    Code Respository swatch themes switcher
    8
    8
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    4k Views
    @veronikya it might flicker on load, yes, and that’s normal. It’s because the CSS and JS are loaded before the custom elements, but it shouldn’t be too bad on reasonable links. It shouldn’t flicker at all navigating through the site though as the CSS and JS are already loaded.
  • 35 Votes
    36 Posts
    8k Views
    no problem. I was waiting for this new version to change my server but I think I’m going to install the old one. Keep the good work bro
  • NodeBB: Creating the Swatch modes

    Solved Configure swatch
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    599 Views
    @mventures the swatch feature you refer to isn’t a NodeBB plugin, but a utility that I wrote that handles this. It is available for v2 (as you can see here) but I’ve stopped developing and releasing the code because it has been entirely rewritten to work for v3. If you’d like the code, this is possible, but you’ll need to upgrade to v3 first.
  • Clustering for NodeBB enabled

    Announcements cluster
    22
    1
    16 Votes
    22 Posts
    3k Views
    @Madchatthew True. I think this is the reason as to why most Open Source projects are abandoned because they are not sustainable in the long-term.
  • Testing out Webdock.io

    Moved Announcements webdock recovery speed
    2
    5
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    Just coming back to this thread for review (as I often do), and it looks like Webdock have increased their available offerings - some are extremely powerful, yet very competitive from the pricing perspective. [image: 1692559685163-7cf9a928-ac21-44fe-99c6-90439030d631-image.png] 10 CPU cores, plus 20Gb RAM? Well worth a look (and the asking price) - there’s also a fixed IP which is hugely beneficial. Clearly, this is well beyond what most people will want to spend - it’s more of an example (but interestingly, Sudonix runs on something not too different from the above). However, not all that glitters is gold - just have a walk through the benchmark report I found below and you’ll see a huge difference between Heztner and Webdock https://www.vpsbenchmarks.com/compare/hetzner_vs_webdock That being said, the amount of HTTP requests that Webdock handles in relation to Hetzner is superior - @DownPW you might want to have a look at this - there’s a free 24 hour trial… [image: 1692560710486-5203639b-2f62-47e6-b87b-37580ce5deae-image.png]
  • Fancybox now used for image handling

    Announcements fancybox
    16
    6 Votes
    16 Posts
    3k Views
    And it seems to be less conflicting!