Skip to content

Most privacy / security focused password manager

Unsolved Privacy
12 4 3.6k 1

Related Topics
  • 2 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @Muhammad-Abdan-Farooqui Welcome! i’m currently using (and recommend) Bitdefender. For my sins, I’m using Windows, but need this for teams and Office365 integration (otherwise I’d always choose Linux). Have you looked at the Bitdefender product for MAC? https://www.bitdefender.com/en-gb/consumer/antivirus-for-mac
  • Ex GCHQ employee risk to national security

    Discussion gchq security
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    Madchatthew
    @phenomlab said in Ex GCHQ employee risk to national security: I can’t believe also that security is so lax that someone without adequate clearance can waltz into a restricted area and take what they want. Yeah I can’t believe that either. It is crazy
  • 1 Votes
    1 Posts
    842 Views
    No one has replied
  • 12 Votes
    8 Posts
    9k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells good question. Gmail being provided by Google is going to be one of the more secure by default out of the box, although you have to bear in mind that you can have the best security in the world, but that is easily diluted by user decision. Obviously, it makes sense to secure all cloud based services with at least 2fa protection, or better still, biometric if available, but email still remains vastly unprotected (unless enforced in the sense of 2fa, which I know Sendgrid do) because of user choice (in the sense that users will always go for the path of least resistance when it comes to security to make their lives easier). The ultimate side effect of taking this route is being vulnerable to credentials theft via phishing attacks and social engineering. The same principle would easily apply to Proton Mail, who also (from memory) do not enforce 2fa. Based on this fact, neither product is more secure than the other without one form of additional authentication at least being imposed. In terms of direct attack on the servers holding mail accounts themselves, this is a far less common type of attack these days as tricking the user is so much simpler than brute forcing a server where you are very likely to be detected by perimeter security (IDS / IPS etc).
  • 4 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    JAC
    @phenomlab said in TikTok fined £12.7m for misusing children’s data: Just another reason not to use TikTok. Zero privacy, Zero respect for privacy, and Zero controls in place. https://news.sky.com/story/tiktok-fined-12-7m-for-data-protection-breaches-12849702 The quote from this article says it all TikTok should have known better. TikTok should have done better They should have, but didn’t. Clearly the same distinct lack of core values as Facebook. Profit first, privacy… well, maybe. Wow, that’s crazy! so glad I stayed away from it, rotten to the core.
  • iPhone Data and privacy

    Privacy apple privacy
    2
    4 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    Here’s a very useful video that will walk you through the privacy features of Android - mostly around the ones you should disable to get the most out of the experience
  • The Multi-Billion Pound Catfishing Industry

    Blog catfishing security fraud
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Wasting a scammer's time is hugely entertaining

    Blog security blog
    1
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied